• Tujio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    18 days ago

    I know that knocking on it is overdone, but Phantom Menace. I was 13 when it came out, huge Star Wars fan, absolutely target market. Walked out so sad and confused.

  • Xed@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 days ago

    The Avatar the last air bender ( live action ) movie. I was a child when the movie came out so I had no clue who the director was and how shitty of a movie I was in for. The ending recked me since it didn’t even have a satisfying conclusion. Just pure garbage

    I was in genuine shock of how bad of a movie I’d gotten into. Never again

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Should have stuck to the book. Doing vignettes about how the invasion affected people would have been far more interesting.

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        the book and the movie have absolutely nothing in common besides the name. it was such a disapointing mediocre zombie film, based on a really good book that used “zombies” to explore war, survival, refuge crisis…

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 days ago

    “Sky Captain And The World Of Tomorrow.”

    The beginning is great. Giant robots attacking New York.

    Then it just becomes boring and ridiculous.

    Posters promised Angelina Jolie. she shows up for five minutes and doesn’t do anything.

    • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 days ago

      Not saying you’re wrong, but praising the giant robot attack on New York before swerving into critiquing the latter half of the movie for being ridiculous is a funny juxtaposition.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        Here’s the way I look at it.

        A fictional story should follow its own rules. Let’s take “The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly.” The idea that someone would let himself be hung, trusting the other guy to be able to make that incredible shot over and over and never miss, is nonsensical. But we in the audience accept that premise for the sake of the story. We’d be disappointed if, halfway through the movie, an orchestra appears in the middle of the desert and they do a big musical number.

        “Sky Captain” was ridiculous because of the way the story kept shifting and the rules kept changing.

        • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          I admit that I saw Sky Captain once, many many years ago, so I’m not going to be able to back this up with too many specific citations, but you’ve also not said specifically what rule they set up and fail to follow, so we’re even.

          It’s a pastiche of pulp fiction concepts from the 30s-50s. Giant robots, airships, Nazi scientists, Shangri-La, dinosaurs, android assassins, the works. The whole thing is like a loving homage to Doc Savage’s greatest hits. I don’t see how any of that “breaks rules”.

          Like I said, I won’t dispute your overall finding of the film being, “meh”. I watched it once 20 years ago and haven’t gone back since, so I’m not exactly leaping up to defend it’s execution, but I also think “the rules kept changing” is an empty critique, as it stands currently.

            • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              18 days ago

              You’re under no obligation to continue the discussion, sure, but it seems disingenuous to me to open a thread saying “Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow is a bad movie because it fails to follow it’s own internal logic”. Then, upon having that assertion challenged, you jump to, “I’m not gonna argue about this.” Like, why comment at all if you’re not interested in discussing, and yes, maybe even defending, your take? Regardless, if that’s not what you’re here to do, have a good day.

              • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 days ago

                If you actually thought I was under no obligation, you wouldn’t have sent your note, which I consider a masterpiece of passive aggressiveness.

                I throw it back at you. You had all afternoon to actually watch the movie and present extensive notes.

                Like, why did you comment at all?

  • Maestro@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 days ago

    Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker. I went in with very low expectations and it still managed to disappoint so badly that it makes me angry. I hate how the Palpatine plot point retroactively ruins the entire original trilogy.

    • Ihnivid@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      My biggest problem with this the sequels is that Luke’s character just got completely butchered.

      You really want me to believe that one of my childhood heros, who against all odds, against his mentors judgement, decided to go all in on the “There’s good in my father, I’ll save him or die.”-train would grow old and wants to kill his own fucking nephew because he’s seeing something evil in him?

      • nautevenkidding@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        That was last Jedi though, was it not? I never watched rise of Skywalker, the Luke story ended with him vanishing into the force at the end of last Jedi if I recall correctly.

  • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 days ago

    Fury Road 2: They got rid of a lot of the practical effects that made the first one great. The plot and pacing was off. I was just annoyed because of how much I liked the first one.

  • Ihnivid@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    It’s been a while, but that would be Sin City 2 for me. Back then I was young and naive, and didn’t know that 99% of sequels are soulless cashgrabs. And I was really hyped, I loved the first one and still think of it as the best comic book adaptation I’ve ever seen. You could see the love in every frame.

  • missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    Violet Evergarden: The Movie. My heart sank when I realized exactly where this was going, after all of her character development that’s the ending they decided to undermine it all with.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      It made me want to never re-watch the series, too. The pedophilic undercurrent to the movie makes parts of the show so, so, much worse.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    The Matrix. The 1st two movies seemed to set up the perfect twist for the 3rd movie…that Zion was still inside the Matrix, and there was no escape. But, then they went in a completely different direction, that made no sense, instead. Then they came out with the 4th movie, and still never fixed it. Why?

  • IanTwenty@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    Once Upon a Time in America. Maybe I watched a bad version but it made little sense and the ending was dreadful.

    Reading about it right now on wikipedia I probably saw the ‘condensed’ version which was savaged by the critics:

    Some critics compared shortening the film to shortening Richard Wagner’s operas, saying that works of art that are meant to be long should be given the respect they deserve. In his 1984 review, Roger Ebert gave the uncut version four stars out of four and wrote that it was “an epic poem of violence and greed”, but described the American theatrical version as a “travesty”. Furthermore, he gave the American theatrical version one star out of four, calling it “an incomprehensible mess without texture, timing, mood, or sense”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Once_Upon_a_Time_in_America

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Fantastic four 2015, great first half and Phillip Glass soundtrack! But studio/publisher meddling destroyed the second half

    I saw the Phantom menace on release, that was a huge let down

    • ecvanalog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      I actually agree that the first half was great and there were some solid bones and performances but I don’t think there was a break movie just below the surface of FF. Nothing we have seen or heard from that third act suggests Trank’s cut would have been demonstrably better.

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    easy one: Jurassic Park (1993)

    I had read the book, maybe, a dozen times before the film came out, and holy shit was I disappointed. crushed, really. Not just in what they changed, but also what they left out. it totally ruined for me books adapted to film. any time I see a film based on a book I’ve read, I’m always let down.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      oh man I was so disapointed in the book compared to the moive. I feel crichton has great ideas but is not a good writer. It is one of the few writers where I prefer the movies.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Try reading “The Great Train Robbery.”

        He wrote it as if it were a factual reconstruction of an actual crime. Long passages on things like rat baiting, penny hangs, tipping servants, and other Victoriana

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          I have not read that but I don’t read much now so I doubt I will get around to it. Top of my list is reading the wheel of time that jordan did not write to finish off the series.

  • ⠀Q⠀@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    X-Men Phoenix - such a great grafic novel arch and solid movies before that flick. Phoenix writing and acting saddens me.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    I fell asleep while watching James Cameron’s Avatar in an IMAX theater on release.

    Most tedious movie of his career until the sequels (guessing, didn’t give the sequels a chance because why would I?)