• Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    12 days ago

    Bring it on!!!

    Autoimmune disease? GONE!

    Acne? GONE!

    Don’t like your eye color? CHANGE IT!

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        12 days ago

        Thats not really true.

        The US is an exception but generally, the cost of therapies becomes commercially viable with the passage of time.

        For example, our 2 year old daughter just had her DNA profiled because she has a few manageable, yet ongoing developmental deficiencies. Her DNA markers will guide her treatment.

        When I was a child this type of treatment was sci-fi, and when it was invented you could have said “by rich for rich” or whatever.

    • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 days ago

      Shit’s going to get pretty weird imo. Hopefully it isn’t used for eugenics purposes (it probably will be, let’s be honest). I don’t think that people should be able to change so many things that they become unrecognizable, but I can understand changing a few things per person, voluntarily, obviously.

      • Beacon@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 days ago

        I believe in bodily autonomy. People should be able to do whatever they want to their own body.

        • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          Allowed, sure, just don’t think it’s a good idea to completely change who you are. I want humans to be recognizable as such. I’m more worried about what parents will be doing to their children, that’s where the eugenics shit becomes a problem. Getting rid of “undesirable” traits and whatnot.

      • black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        There are a lot more problems in trying to create the infrastructure to enforce sanctioned uses of any readily accessible technology than there is in the use of said tool. The people who want to do the most harm inevitability wind up in the oversight position, while society tends to create enforcement mechanisms at a social, interpersonal level organically already.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      Don’t want to stop being cruel and violent? Want to keep committing atrocity against vulnerable individuals while destroying human-supporting environments on Earth, for absolutely no practical benefit to yourself? Well good news! Investor-driven medical research is here to protect you (and only you) from the consequences of your monstrous choices!

    • termaxima@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      And enjoy the 5 cancers you just caused yourself by editing other genes that happen to contain the targeted sequence !

    • offspec@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      12 days ago

      I feel obligated to mention that he doesn’t modify his own genes, he infects himself with a modified bacteria that produces lactase.

    • ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      First-in-human just means it’s the first time that specific therapy is being tested on humans instead of animals (e.g. mice, dogs, monkeys), and the primary objective of the trial is to test that it’s safe for use in humans. It doesn’t refer to the concept of gene editing or lowering cholesterol.

    • nicolauz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      I don’t understand why you used “but”, where it should clearly be “as well as”…

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 days ago

      I have high cholesterol. I can send you some if you want. Promise it will make you live longer, it says so on this lemmy comment…

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 days ago

      You need to reach out to the scientists to let them know! You could save lives with your insight!

    • termaxima@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’m sorry to inform you that you have fallen for online propaganda. Cholesterol definitely is bad for you.