• FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Are you inplying these older cars weren’t intended to last longer than 100k because I’d wager most of the cars in the top image at least doubled that before going to scrap.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Curious how old you are, because until this century, a car with 100,000 on the odometer was considered a piece of crap no one in their right mind would buy. Powertrain warranties of 50,000 were pretty nice in the 90s and when 100,000 came out people were astounded. 3 years/36K was standard warranty for everything else.

      SOURCE: Worked Nissan consumer affairs, late 90s.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Problem was mostly rust because they used unprotected steel without any zink coating. In a wet country that would damage the frame and chassis within a few years, and sooner or later you end up patching one hole after the other. It’s even worse when they use salt on the roads in winter.

      I watch some car restoration channel on YouTube. Some old cars look excellent at first, untill they lift it up and the floor plate or any mounts crumble into dust because some water was leaking inside the door frame, into the trunk or some hidden corner.