• pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 month ago

    Great! Now the AI can play the video games for me while I do the dishes. I swear it was the other way around in the SciFi.

    • aurelar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 month ago

      So you can spend more time working shit jobs for shit pay. Aren’t you happy? 😊

    • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I want LLMs to be used to create thousands of characters that have agency in like, Skyrim or something, and to watch the absolutely unhinged fucking chaos of what it creates.

      I don’t want it to play games for me.

      • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t even want that, I’d rather a game have its characters and writing created with intent by a person who cares.

        • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          30 days ago

          If you use ai as an additive technology rather a replacement to things then really cool, ethical oppurtinitites open up for its use.

          Rather than training a voice actor for a small handful of npcs that say the same four lines ad infinitum,pay them the same amount to License their voice, train a model, and use that for the game. Pair this with an LLM and suddenly you have pcs capable of saying all kinds of hillarious shit.

          Have the coders that always write box behaviour to write the behaviour of npcs. The give players the option to talk them into doing some weird LLM powered shit.

          Like. You can use ai to add things to games. It doesn’t have to replace people’s

          I think a part of why people hate it is that idiots are trying to use it to replace things people do.

          Where it’s best is when it does things people can’t

          • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            I’m going to be honest those do not sound like good uses. I want games to be designed with intent, not on the spot by an LLM.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s cool. AI can do art and writing and video games for me. It can watch all my shows. All I have to do is work and maybe sleep. Sounds fun.

  • TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    I guess Elon won’t be needing gamers’ services to max out his characters anymore.

    Fucking AI taking valuable jobs away again.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    Y’all laugh but there are way too many people into idle games, not to mention people who prefer watching a stream (even without commentary) over playing a game itself.

    I cannot comprehend why, though, just like I can’t comprehend how cheating (particularly single player) can be fun.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      how cheating (particularly single player) can be fun

      Have you never played a game with unreasonable grind that saps all the fun out of it ? Often just to drive player hours and ‘engagement’. Multiplayer cheats however can die in a fire.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I suppose. When I’m referring to cheats, it’s more in regards to invulnerability, infinite resources, etc., which seem to sap the point of having a game in the first place. Like making the fun parts into a grind, rather than the other way around.

        That said, I’ll also say sometimes part of the challenge is the grind, so it depends. You have to pick your own poison, right?

        Like, take Silksong for example. You lose out on the full experience if you mod out the annoying run from bench to boss, it’s like a 40 second annoyance built in punishment. But I get why you’d do that-- it’s technically there for a reason but I get it. Hell, even the difficulty adjustment mods I can understand.

        But making the bosses die in one hit or making yourself invulnerable? Now you’ve lost me, that’s like a core element of the game; you might as well just watch someone else play it because what’s the point.

        • mech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Some games I want to play just to experience the storyline, but without getting stressed by danger or frustrated by getting stuck.

    • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t watch others playing games, either, but someone who likes those streams told me he didn’t see a difference between watching good gamers play games and good football players play football.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      You never used cheat codes in GTA San Andreas and the like? It’s a lot of fun

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I actually thought about that after my comment and summoning a tank from nowhere was fun. At least for a little bit… but maybe mostly for the novelty of it all. Also I was like, 12.

    • KelvarCherry [They/Them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was laughing along until you said “watching a stream (even without commentary)”. Yeah I’ve done that one. Sometimes I want to see what’s next in the game without spending 100 hours to get there ><. Also watching lets me mentally unwind, playing takes a mental toll.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think we’re all kinda beat down by life, so I don’t really judge people on it. I just am not one of them, haha. (But I don’t even watch TV or movies much so I’m admittedly a weirdo).

        • KelvarCherry [They/Them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I also don’t watch TV or movies – only Twitch streams. I’ve been this way even when not beaten down by capitalism and fascism though. Even when I’m taking a break from working on creative projects, it’s still nice to be able to turn my brain off and get the experience of seeing the game. Maybe my unmedicated ADHD makes me that way.

  • MoreZombies@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    How much legal trouble would I get for kicking a CEO in the testicles? it feels like it would be worth it if I ever met NVIDIA’s bosses.

    • KelvarCherry [They/Them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      None if you don’t get caught. They’re not going to do a full investigation if you don’t try to murder the guy. Also, look how badly the current FBI fumbled the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s killer? into Brian Thompson’s killer?

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s crazy how much Brian Thompson isn’t even a name in my head. If someone murders me, I only hope they’re not so charismatic that when people try to remember me they just picture a beige balloon named John Lastname.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    The age of ai-generated streamers is coming…

    People and corporations will automatize all the process and turn it into passive income, and a lot of people will somehow watch it, making the thing profitable.

    I’m tired of all this…

    • KelvarCherry [They/Them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      A Minecraft and Roblox streamer tried that a year ago, primarily as a pitch to investors to make a service for other streamers to make AI-generated content. His name is Kwebbelkop. This guy managed to make the laziest brand of content I have ever even heard suggested as an idea: An AI avatar reading an AI reaction to an AI-generated image. And I thought reaction videos were bad…

      I’m tired of all this…

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Actually if they can use that to make good ai opponents for 4x games, it’d be pretty sweet

    • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except you don’t need a neural net to do this, nor would you really want one for it because it would be incredibly slow unless you use the GPU to run it which might be a bit busy running the actual game. It’s like a “make game run worse” option.

      In game AI can be pretty sophisticated even without the addition of neural nets which could be OK with determining strategy based on player action, but really isn’t going to be good for the entire control.

      This kind of thing is only useful as tech demo for playing platformers and the like with the same inputs a human player would, basically more like a bot.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        In game AI can be pretty sophisticated even without the addition of neural nets which could be OK with determining strategy based on player action, but really isn’t going to be good for the entire control.

        Given that it has been the weak point in almost all 4x games in the past 30 years, I’d be happy if they give anything novel a try

        • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I could see a way for it to work, but this tech certainly isn’t it and you’d need to balance the size of the model for memory use and performance.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    FYI: Stuff like this is for automated testing, not “playing games for you” 🤣

    Also, I won’t consider it realistic until it can type out, “lol git gud scrub” after ganking someone who just spawned.

  • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bold to assume having an AI play the game for testing is actually useful. Given how buggy games release nowadays i genuinely wonder which companies still properly have play testers. An AI whose results you mostly ignore is pointless.

    • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I suspect it’s not a lack of playtesters that’s the problem, but harsh deadlines and crunch. That type of environment leads to tech debt to get things working fast, which leads to hard-to-manage code, which leads to bugs…

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      An AI whose results you mostly ignore is pointless good for driving up the share price artificially

      ftfy