• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Dunno why it’s so hard to figure out or why people bitch about it.

    Posting certain words will often get your social media submission blocked, pushed way down by the algorithm, or run up against a rule of some kind.

    So people make up stuff like “unalived” or “sh•t” or “f•ck” so they don’t run up against soft censorship.

    That’s how it is. It’s not Earth shattering, it’s censorship.

    • s@piefed.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem is the corporate system and that people are willing to abide by and accept that system, and when they bring the compromises due to the system to places (such as the Threadiverse) to which those compromises are irrelevant.

      • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’d like to see more outright bans against doing this.

        Curse or don’t curse. Pick a fucking lane you snivelling cowards.

    • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Except that there’s no evidence that saying “killed” or “murdered” for example, actually does push you down the algorithm. And if it did, surely saying “unalived” would have the same effect by now, since the algorithm could easily be extended to this term, and it’s been in use for ages.
      People censoring themselves in this way, preemptively, with no certainty that it is making a difference is like late-stage Orwellian batshit insanity.
      It’s enough of a reason on its own to avoid those platforms. When even the creators are disingenuous enough to self-censor inoffensive words in an effort to appease an opaque algorithm, the content cannot possibly be meaningful.