• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        He actually does know how to make good games, but the problems start as soon as he’s put in front of a camera.

        Don’t have him going on TV and talking about the game. In fact make it a term of his employment that is not allowed to mention the game at all in any environment. Just take his phone off him basically. If he was just left alone to develop a game it would be fine. All common sense goes out the window as soon as he’s interviewed.

        • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          He knew how to make good games back in the day, he doesn’t any more or simply doesn’t care.

          Masters of Albion seems to be largely based on his previous game, Legacy, which was a crypto/NFT scam (selling virtual land based on speculative pitch that the tokens would make mad real world money).

          I tried Legacy for an hour (just out of curiosity), it’s shit. Almost feels like a low effort game to justify the pump and dump in-game land sale.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I mean have you SEEN his latest cash grab? It doesn‘t even need his name attached to reek of failure.

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It wasn’t terrible for what it was. I just remember being let down after years of listening to my best friend’s other friend telling me all of these promises he had fully subscribed to. It all sounded too good to be true, but both us and the industry itself were too young to have experienced overpromises like that. I thought maybe I just didn’t know how far technology had come, and we were about to see it fully manifest in all its glory…

      But what we got was a fuck load of bloom and a few branching choices. And a marriage system that let you be gay. I definitely made my guy gay. Well, not at first. At first I married the barber because I thought I’d get free haircuts. That didn’t work. So I made my guy gay.

      • orbitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yup I recall a friend telling me of all these awesome things, not what the things were anymore but articles he read of Fable, and them not being there. He has a habit of over promising features while still making a decent (sometimes awesome) and fun game but it doesn’t help when he talks up about things that aren’t in the released version.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Fable 1 was a game I had lots of fun with. Being Brazilian, I was more or less immune to the hype buildup around the game, so I had no clue what was promised vs. what was delivered until years later

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    The fact that he knows that people won’t believe him is hilarious. It means he’s fully aware that he has a problem and has never taken any steps to fix it.

    He wants to rejuvenate his reputation but the time to do that was about 25-30 years ago. If you make one game and you’ve over promised on it, the very next game has to be your redemption, or you go CDPR route and you fix it, you can’t do it decades later.

    • Thalfon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      A redemption arc this late would’ve had to have been quietly making a great game, no big announcements in advance until it was done or nearly so and playable, and then letting it speak for itself.

    • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s unlikely that Masters of Albion will be his return to form.

      It looks to be largely based on his previous “game”, Legacy, which was a crypto/NFT scam.

      • BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I watched a video of some of the “gameplay” of that, and… Wow. It is the most by the numbers mundane idle game I’ve ever seen. Inspired, how uninspired it is.

        • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          I played Legacy for an hour purely out of curiosity. It was absolute shit. Boring, uninspired, “worst of mobile” gameplay, generic visuals, multiplayer tacked on in a way that doesn’t enhance the gameplay. I will speculate they simply repurposed the Legacy engine for Masters of Albion.

          It’s almost certainly going to be terrible.

          If you want a business sim, you would be far better of looking at the Capitalism series, Industry Giant 2 (it holds up pretty even after 20+ years) or perhaps Big Ambitions.

  • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Molyneaux is of course an extreme case, but I do find it remarkable how many of these “legends” of old utterly failed to replicate their success later down the line. Romero, Mitsoda, Roberts, so many more, all in the lamplight for their success in the 90s to very early 2000s, but utterly unable to live up to their reputation for near 3 decades after.