Just signed it. It’s over 2.2M now
I often come up with a fun nickname for UK leaders - from “Creepy Uncle Boris”, through “Sussy Sunak”.
I’d like to inaugurate “Stasi Starmer” in memory of this absolutely insane decision.
Is he a double agent for the far right?
He is giving free points to Farage like he is… A fecking idiot
No, Fuck Farage vote Greens. Zach Polanski is who you should be supporting!
If my post made anyone think I support Farage, I apologise. Starmer though… He doesn’t does he?
I’m pointing out that it’s a bad idea to focus on the worst candidate that opposes Digital IDs while there are others with better politics.
He’s a straight up reform plant. Nothing else makes sense at this point.
On one hand, I agree with all the concerns listed in the article. Of course it’s all in the implementation. Digital ID doesn’t necessarily have to be terribly implemented and a privacy nightmare, but I doubt any current government would implement it any other way.
That said, it makes me pretty grumpy that people are happy enough to have corporations like google, amazon, facebook, et al know everything about them, but somehow a government ID is a bridge too far.
That said, it makes me pretty grumpy that people are happy enough to have corporations like google, amazon, facebook, et al know everything about them, but somehow a government ID is a bridge too far.
Those companies don’t yet have an army of goons who will round up dissidents.
And frankly I’m not that worried about what Labour might do with a digital ID scheme, but the next government will be one to watch out for.
it makes me pretty grumpy that people are happy enough to have corporations like google, amazon, facebook, et al know everything about them, but somehow a government ID is a bridge too far.
People can make the choice to engage with those companies, but the government want to force the matter. Plus of course I can always just stop interacting with the companies if I decide they have got gone too far. They won’t get any more data from me then. But I can’t opt out of governmental ID cards.
I don’t think it’s possible, in 2025, to opt out of engagement with these companies in any practical way.
The federal government already has an abundance of personal information about me. If they issue a digital ID I’m not providing them any additional information.
Whenever someone googles anything, they’re providing google with hew, intensely personal, information.
While you, personally, might take digital privacy seriously and leak less than a fishes asshole, we both know that the vast majority of people literally can’t take a shit without telling google how well their spouse’s new meds are working.
You can theoretically opt out of a great many things, but that doesn’t mean the behavior is practically possible.
I don’t agree with the digital ID since it has implications to snowball further down road into a tool for a implemented authoritarian surveillance state.
But the fact everyone basically carries a smartphone with personal data that is linked to private corporations is kinda ironic.
Like the government can’t have a digital footprint of you but Google, Apple, Samsung etc can.
I’m sure these private companies are the bastions of privacy. They surely won’t sell your data or bend over to government subpoenas at the first real threat to their bottom line.
No discussion regarding this digital ID has rwally mentioned this and I find it incredibly concerning.
There should be base line regulation stopping this both at the private and governmental levels. But if the last 5ish years have shown in the world, most people are realistically comfrontable and complacent in all this. At least until the gestapo are at your door., but then it’s a week bit too late isn’t it.
I have a passport, driving licence in addition to other info necessary for applying for a job eg NI number.
Why do I need an ID? I bet there’d be some charge for it too. No. On principle no. He can get fucked.
Britain doing overtime trying to overtake America in the fascism rankings.
Handing your information to Peter Thiel and palantir just like the us did
did Starmer figure out that Facial Rec wasn’t working?
Protip: if you’re having to take bets between adults and the horny kids getting porn… bet on the horny kids.
It would not surprise me a bit if the petition is ignored.
I don’t get it. What’s wrong with digital ID? Most EU countries have digital certificates and/or some sort of a government app you can use as an ID. What’s different here?
it’s a slippery slope:
- want to buy alcohol? must scan your digital ID. Now the government knows how much you drink.
- want entry to this nightclub? must scan your digital ID. Now the government knows you go to G.A.Y on Fridays.
- want to withdraw cash from the bank? yeah, you need a valid digital ID scan.
The next government could massively curtail freedom of movement, protest and expression with the tools this government are intent on forging. Remember, they already tried to make porn subject to age checks, and everyone installed a VPN. Want to use a VPN? we’re going to need a digital ID scan please.
Interesting. In other countries digital ID is treated the same as normal ID card. When I’m buying alcohol I can scan my digital ID or just show my card. No one is forcing anyone to only use the digital one. Are there any indications that the plan is to deprecate physical cards?
I’m a risk averse person. I don’t see “in other countries they do X,” rather I think “if this happens and a government gets in whose interests are unaligned with my own, what could they do with this new power I let them have.”
In the case of the UK, the far right is on the rise. Today if a digital ID card is introduced, then probably no one will force me to use it. However in the future that can change.
Let me give you an example: the UK allowed the government to change the law so that it gets to determine who is a terrorist and who isn’t. They don’t need to go to court, or have a judge sign off. They use these powers to silence legitimate protest against a number of issues that inconvenienced the billionaire class.
Imagine attending a protest to call for the government to be held to account for a bad decision it made, and the next day your digital ID no longer allows you to travel to work by train. We are giving them the legal power to do this, if we stand by and do not resist.
Also, I’m lucky enough to be a citizen of the country I live in. Will enforcing some addition “digital proof of citizenship” make the country a better place? Will it make undocumented people decide to leave or simply more desperate/vulnerable? If they get sick, will they be afraid to seek medical care - spreading illness rather than getting treatment.
I get it but I still think it’s more about just being against the government than any realistic risk. You already have to show your ID to buy alcohol or enter some places. The government could simply require shop owners to scan the ID with government app. Digital ID is not needed to monitor where each ID is used. And you don’t have to show your ID to use public transport. Just having digital ID doesn’t mean it will be mandatory to use it everywhere. They can just as easily require normal ID everywhere. The risks you’re describing are basically a big stretch. But I get it, you don’t trust this government to do anything so this includes digital ID.
You already have to show your ID to buy alcohol or enter some places.
and who cares about that? It’s an entirely different situation. the card is not scanned, it is not recorded in a database that you were there. a person just checks it with their eyes.
The government could simply require shop owners to scan the ID with government app.
the point is that it would be a noticeable, suspicious change for more people. but when its dressed as convenience first and then deprecation of “obsolete” “insecure” practices, it is not. then concerns like this can just be handwaved away, that “oh it surely won’t happen”
And you don’t have to show your ID to use public transport.
in my country you already have to scan your monthly pass, tied to your id. travel information is also persisted for years. they banned paper passes in law.
in my country you already have to scan your monthly pass, tied to your id. travel information is also persisted for years. they banned paper passes in law.
This just confirms my point. Those practices are not tied to digital ID. You can gather the same data without digital ID and having digital ID does not automatically mean data will be gathered. People simply don’t want government to do anything because they don’t trust it. And this is fine. I was just wandering if digital ID in itself is a bad idea for some reason but I see it’s not.
Those practices are not tied to digital ID.
Except that they are, so that they can check whether you are the actual owner of the pass.
having digital ID does not automatically mean data will be gathered.
it is gathered, and that is not a question. a screen shows the bus driver your ID number, because on paper everyone should also show their ID for the driver to check that the numbers match. now in reality that rarely happens because it slows down boarding, but your ID is still registered and tied to your pass. the GDPR document also mentions it.
People simply don’t want government to do anything because they don’t trust it.
thats a nice distraction to tell for yourself, but the transportation company was not governmentally owned when the law came into effect.
was just wandering if digital ID in itself is a bad idea for some reason but I see it’s not.
it is, because it makes connecting already collected information to an exact person much easier and impossible to deny, and because computerized tracking is much less visible than if the bus driver or shop keeper would have to jot down your ID number or take a picture with their phone.
