• qualia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    19 hours ago

    For those like me who didn’t know this word:

    ardent - Displaying or characterized by strong enthusiasm or devotion; fervent.

  • tourist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Was he not both of those things?

    Ardent Nazi: Literally a Nazi general

    Bad General: Literally lost the war

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The joke isn’t thar it’s not true, it’s that World of Tanks is full of the kind of people who will drop everything they’re doing to defend him.

      And kinda. Not sure how deep of a true believer her was, but he was definitely close with the head guy, and allegedly got promoted very quickly as a consequence. Which, conveniently: he was arguably an excellent officer, perhaps one of the best Germany had, but used his aforementioned influence to get promoted way, waaaaay above his capacity at the time, and then subordinate the entire front to himself. This led to a series of stunning victories that ended in a resounding strategic defeat, which makes perfect sense when the guy who’s supposed to be the general is off playing officer because that’s all he knows.

      • luciferofastora@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Strategy vs. Operations

        He was good at the latter, as far as I understand, but a General needs to coordinate multiple operations to support and build off of each other.

    • Thalion@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I assume you’re trolling but A) you either know nothing about Rommel, or don’t know what ardent means, and B) you figure a country losing a war means every general they had was a bad general?