• AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Did anyone else watch Kat’s video of being “thrown” to the ground and think it was more like a push followed by loss of balance? To me, “thrown to the ground” means you give them more downward force than just gravity.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The clip you showed there was what I was thinking of. I saw it as part of a much larger video posted by Kat, and I wasn’t sure that was the “throw” everyone else was referencing. It’s definitely that officer’s fault she went to the ground. He threw her laterally, causing her to fall backwards.

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            “thrown to the ground” vs. thrown (really, pushed) laterally. Yep.

            It may seem minor. If someone said they were punched, and you watched their video and they were slapped hard, you’d wonder why they were sloppy in the characterization. It doesn’t make slapping good.

    • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s your gripe? That’s what you’re splitting hairs on? The angle of force delineating “shove” vs. “push”? What a weak-as-fuck whinge.

      One would think most people possess a cognitive filter to keep that level of stupid from escaping the bounds of their internal monologue. Well, maybe a decade ago, one would… 🤔

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        No, I share the main gripe as everyone else. It’s also important to me that my “side” be as accurate as possible. I am raising a side issue.

        I’m sure you and others have the capacity to discuss more than one thing at once.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wish her the best of luck, but seriously, I’m to the point now where I sincerely think a clean break from the DNC and the creation of a new party is going to be a better move. Get all the progressives to do that, and you’ve got the nascent core of a new party that actually aligns with the interests of the vast majority of citizens.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Better for building a principled platform, sure, but way worse if we actually want that platform to win. Basically every new successful party in this country emerged when one of the existing parties completely dominated the other.

      If we want a progressive party, step one is to keep the Republicans from winning anywhere. Destroy the Republicans, and you give politically savvy progressives the confidence to vote progressive without risking abject fascism.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      7 days ago

      The fascists proved that it’s easier to appropriate an existing tool than build a new one from scratch.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think I disagree because there are just so many ridiculous roadblocks to ballot access for third parties in different states, plus even if you can overcome that and win you’ll run into a bunch of institutional roadblocks if you don’t caucus with a “major” party (e.g. if you want a seat on one of those bipartisan committees that hash out 90% of the discussion on a lot of boring-but-important stuff before it even gets to the legislature), but I can definitely see where you’re coming from