• HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    8 天前

    Greentheonly, the hacker who helped recover the data in the Miami case, continues to probe Tesla Autopilot computers from a basement workshop strewn with circuit boards and soldering equipment.

    That work is only becoming harder, he said, as Tesla is tightening the controls over access to vehicle crash data. “If an accident happened today like this, I won’t be able to extract the data,” he said.

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 天前

      Also, I was siiting here in the dark with dark mode and couldn’t even read it because I got blinded like staring into 1000 suns.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 天前

    Tesla deleted crash information to bot be held liable. So they tampered with evidence, a criminal offense.

    Now the investigation needs to start into who deleted that data and on whose orders and all those people will be sent to jail, right?

    Right?

    • AlexLost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 天前

      You know what, if a company can be a person with the same rights and privileges thanks to citizens United, why can’t a company be jailed? Let’s just say Tesla broke the law and must spend the appropriate amount of time behind bars, unable to do business.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 天前

      But… They didn’t delete the data. The hacker found the data. It was there.

      They lied under oath. Aka perjury. Also illegal.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 天前

        As I understood the article, they DID delete the data, just that the hacker found it anyways

    • Skysurfer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 天前

      Do you want realtime traffic updates, live charger status, streaming entertainment, software updates, emergency crash response, Wi-Fi hotspot, remote alarm status and controls, remote telematics? If yes to any of those, then you have your answer.

      Of course, simply having a connection opens it up for privacy abuses, just like a smartphone, there are number of reasons why consumers would want a connected vehicle.

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 天前

        What if the answer to a lot of those is either, “why would I want that?” or “we all have a device that dies that already”.

        • realtime traffic updates - phone
        • live charger status - phone
        • streaming entertainment - phone
        • software updates - not without express approval
        • emergency crash response - I see some value here
        • Wi-Fi hotspot - why
        • Remote alarm status and controls - no
        • remote telematics - absolutely not
        • Skysurfer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 天前

          For sure, I agree the phone integration is a better solution and could easily take the place of any connection requirements for the vehicle, was just providing insight into why any consumer might justify it.

          Why the manufacturers push it would be a totally different answer…

          • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            8 天前

            Why the manufacturers push it

            • realtime traffic updates - subscription revenue
            • live charger status - subscription revenue
            • streaming entertainment - subscription revenue
            • software updates - remove features, introduce bugs or send advertising so you buy a new car
            • emergency crash response - mandatory by law in eu
            • Wi-Fi hotspot - subscription revenue
            • Remote alarm status and controls - subscription revenue
            • remote telematics - they sell it (the user manual for the seat mii explicitly says that)
          • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 天前

            No, your car has an external screen for your phone, so you look at your car the same way you would with an integrated system, but the connectivity comes from your phone.

      • ronigami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 天前

        … no. I don’t really have a need for most of that. And some of it is downright dangerous.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 天前

    I saw the video of the dashcam, the driver is speeding at night in an unfamiliar country road and he’s playing the phone. The “autopilot” disengaged dozens of times that night due to distracted driving, yet that asshole is continuing to override the speed limit while watching that fucking phone.

    Did I understood right that the killer was able to settle for a monetary compensation instead of doing decades of prison for manslaughter?

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 天前

      The family should decide. If they prefer millions and they’re prison abolitionists, that should be the result.