• teamevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Y’all know you can buy VAGCOM software and interface and bypass everything VW throttles in a VW right?

    It’s amazing for VWs you actually own too

  • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    As much as we should hate Tesla, in 2019, they increased the Model 3’s power FOR FREE. I was at 5.2 seconds 0-60, and that was a free update to 4.9s 0-60. I didn’t even have the AWD or performance model. They figured out how to make the motors better and just gave it to everyone. Why isn’t VW doing the same? Fucking greed.

    • Rob1992@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      They didn’t figure out how to make the motors better. They just moved the safety margin

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    While I hate subscription models, this essentially is a tax on poor fuel consumptions. I like that.

    Next we need a frequent driver and frequent flyer tax too

    • enbipanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      How is it a tax if you’re lining a corporate pocket? Or is there some government involvement with taking that money to use it for something?

    • JabbaTheThott@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      While I support using less fossil fuels, this is a terrible way to do it. We should not welcome things that require us to pay a subscription to continue using physical goods we paid for and own.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s on EV cars and while slower acceleration is somewhat more energy efficient, it’s not as pronounced. Also this is probably not a huge delta.

  • tomkatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I already hate how much tech is in my 2020 model. I’m going to drive the thing into the ground.

    • Joeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      8 days ago

      Even more so when you understand the car already has it… so they take it away just to make you pay for it

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        What’s more egregious about this to me is that you’re required to maintain the subscription for what amounts to a one time firmware change.

        ECU tuning isn’t something that’s going to need constant improvements and updates like your typical software product where companies can somewhat justify continued development costs. The engine and transmission are what they are from the factory and unless VW is going to send you a bigger turbo or other performance part, your tune shouldn’t need to change past the initial improvement from stock.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 days ago

        Every car has more HP than you get. Cars are tuned to be as reliable as possible in every condition with a variety of fuel qualities. That is why you see test vehicles on the road, they are gathering data to refine the engine tuning.

        That is why you can tune as car and get more HP or even to make them more efficient without changing a single part.

        • Joeffect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Yes, but in this instance are they just changing the tuning of the car or did they litterally just make your car worse to charge you for it? And call it an upgrade?

          Edit: this sounds like they want to charge you for sport mode… which is basically on all newer cars… either way its pretty trashy move

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 days ago

    Own nothing, pay everything. This bs subscription models for everything need to die. And people who thought about them along with them.

  • alterforlett @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    When I bought my car one of the first brands I decided against was Mercedes due to their subscription model for their electric car.

    VW going for subscription is a surefire way to give Chinese car manufacturers an even bigger part of the market. So, so short sighted

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    If buying isn’t owning then stealing a car isn’t actually stealing

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I would say that excludes them from my future purchases, but honestly, I’m hoping never to buy a car again. Public transit and bicycling are far cheaper, less polluting, and more sustainable (especially in population centers). Maybe I’ll spend a little of the money I save on an occasional day rental if needed.

  • kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Historically many petrol and diesel vehicles have been offered with engines of the same size, but with the possibility of choosing one with more potency,” they said.

    Lol yeah, with ECU tuning from a third party, you assholes just had a board meeting and realized you could turn it into a subscription and then all came on the table and licked it up