- 134 Posts
- 256 Comments
104·6 days agoThere’s also a very good chance that early Half-Life2: Episode 3 builds are in there, but at the time of writing, nobody has found anything related to the legendary sequel that never came. There’s 12 TB after all, so it’s going to take a long time for the community to sift through all the data and work out what it all means.
In other words, this headline is pure speculative click bait.
5·9 days agoCity councils often vote for things that are opposed by most of the community.
Flock surveillance cameras come to mind.
Also, there’s no need to be snarky.
Why does any community still agree to do it?
What makes you think the California community agreed to do it?
Some cities have groups participating in a National Week of Action Against ALPRs, with events scheduled this week:
Your original “pick two” comment implies that you can pick “anonymous” + “free of bots”, or “available to everybody” + “free of bots”. I can’t think of any system that would satisfy those.
The former can be had on a system accessible only by a restricted group of people, through terminals that have no automation interfaces. Think of a local private library with a bulletin board: Only members can enter, and once inside, anyone can post using the provided tools, but there are no tools that bots could use, and there’s nothing connecting an individual to what they post on the board. Of course, a system like this would not be available to everyone; it wouldn’t work as an internet service, for example.
The latter can be had by requiring an access token issued to each user. Bots could then be either ejected quickly by revoking their owner’s token when discovered, or prevented early by requiring all access to be through public terminals that have no automation interfaces. Of course, any system that issues an access token to an individual cannot be anonymous if revocation is to be meaningful.
The government would keep track of whether or not they issued you an ID,
The token/ID system adds anonymityI wish that were possible, but no, it is not. If a government (or any other authority) keeps track of whether they issue someone an ID, then they must also have the ability to connect IDs to individuals. Such an arrangement can only be anonymous if everyone involved is a good-faith actor choosing not to abuse that ability, which history demonstrates is not a realistic assumption.
but your identity is tied to it for the duration
This doesn’t disprove what I wrote, as it’s not anonymous.
you can provide pseudoanonymity,
Pseudoanonymity is not anonymity, regardless of how any given person chooses to define that nebulous term.
My “pick two” stands.
As for humans passing their token to a bot, that’s not really solvable by any system.
Indeed. Which is (part of) why I wrote, “pick two”.
But the human is still the one with the authority, and chooses to delegate to the bot.
Which is what we already have today.
but your identity is tied to it for the duration
Then it’s not anonymous.
If anonymous and available to everyone, what would prevent people from acquiring an ID and passing it on to a bot, or from acquiring multiples?
Epic showed their true colors when their store app was caught rummaging through unrelated files and collecting Steam account data from people’s systems. (This was no surprise coming from the creators of Epic Online Services, or from a CEO like Tim Sweeney, of course.)
Their software won’t be welcome on my systems even if they do make a Linux version.
- anonymous
- available to everyone
- free of (unwanted) bots
Pick two.
Whether 50TB of lost data is “much” depends on what the data is, and whether it’s replaceable.
No. They chose a nonstandard Python because they wanted to use coroutines before standard Python had coroutines.
Your No True Scotsman argument is not only fallacious, but just plain incorrect.
you can’t make games or even big projects for GUI
Oh no? Someone should probably tell the people who made Eve Online.
Youre breaking a core tenant
Did you mean tenet?
I have javascript disabled, and it’s not paywalled for me. Maybe give that a try?
I had been massively burned by empty and dull mission based open world games.
Some “open world” games merely tick the boxes of having a somewhat large area and the ability to traverse it. That alone turns out to be incredibly boring to many of us.
Give me a game world that’s interesting and rewarding to explore. Unique encounters. Unmapped discoveries. Surprising characters. Varied environments. This aspect of an open world is one of the things that Skyrim did fairly well. I wish more game designers would run with the idea.
I hear MapQuest refused.