Lawsuit time
i dont care for Swift but please lawsuit musk😭
I mean in order to sue musk you’d need a pretty strong legal team and a massive fan base for support. Probably a security company to protect you.
I haven’t heard of this swift fellow but I hope they have all that. /S
Jokes aside I can’t wait to hear that song.
I can wait forever for that song, but not for the lawsuit and condemn.
so the king of incels added porn option to its ai. i mean it’s fucking weird but not surprising. after all this is the most divorced man in the universe.
This is just so gross.
Will Grok explode if someone asks it to create an image of a black transexual couple kissing?
Most AI generators are terrible at depicting minorities (I have tried to get them to generate minorities myself). So chances are it will just return white cishet people still
Well some are so good they even drew black people when asked for someone in a Nazi uniform.
This is why in future based media like futurama or starship troopers no one cares about nudity, it’s the inevitable result of technology that the only way past it is to accept it.
This is not about nudity though, this is about consent.
It is consent about nudity.
What they mean is when nudity becomes so common you don’t need consent for it anymore, then nobody would care about fake nudes.
No what you mean s that the majority won’t care. The individual being depicted will still care. You won’t and you seem to assume your opinion will be everyone else’s as well.
deleted by creator
I don’t care about how the characters in fictional shows think about non consensual, fake nude images and I don’t think discussing it does any good. Whoopdeedoo, Leela doesn’t care about deep fakes of herself. She’s also not a real person.
b-b-but muh freeze peach!!!
Is this not a violation of Rafael Cruz and Trump’s “Take it Down Act?”
failed at politics and failing at tech, turned to porn. what a story arc
Removed by mod
“I’m pro AI revenge porn and think it should be legal to create AI revenge porn, to outlaw it is akin to fascism because I should be free to create AI revenge porn. This is democracy, damn it, where AI revenge porn is a pillar of our freedom!”
Maybe you meant to reply to someone else, but as a top level comment, this is what it sounds like you’re saying.
Removed by mod
Nah, the majority of people can decide to outlaw actions in a democratic state. Under consistent understandings of intellectual property, people should have the ability to prevent their likeness becoming a product unless it actual falls under fair use. Like most things AI, pre existing IP laws make most current uses of AI illegal. The only reason it’s still getting pushed is thanks to the rule of law being secondary to the power of money.
The result is that anti deepfake laws aren’t authoritarian unless you consider liberal democracy to be fundamentally authoritarian (which is fair, but only if you’re consistent about it).
Can Grok even generate video?
I was curious and as far as I can tell its for Grok 4 users. I asked the anonymous Grok version how much it cost to use Grok 4 and it said $300 / month. So let’s be clear. Very wealthy and very stupid people are the ones making these videos. No one else.
Well, people may also spend $300, make videos, and then post/host them somewhere where people pay money for them or they get ad revenues or pays for views. In the right place, you could easily make your $300 back plus some. Unethical, certainly, but possible.
