At least, that’s what we assume the report says.
I assume the article covers that.
Probably confirms my preconceived expectations.
The title is kind of genius.
BTW I don’t see this as an actual issue. The important factor is which people read them. If it’s journalist who then report on them, and politicians who then act, then they are still effective. I don’t see why any average citizen should want to go and read them directly
Anyone got a TL;DR?
The UN is struggling financially and this report makes the claim that there’s too many meetings and reports that no one reads. They said their most popular reports get 5000 downloads and 1 in 6 reports gets less than 1000 downloads.
So far i have contributed to that with my own 0
too many meetings and reports that no one reads
Sounds like they’re being run like a big corporation that is too big for their own good
UN something, something…
Thought this would be NotTheOnion
This is the first NotTheOnion-style headline I’ve seen in a looooong time that actually made me laugh. I miss when NotTheOnion wasn’t a constant reminder of the abysmal state of the world.
Sadly no one read this report either.
Personally they should just be TLDRs.
I’ll read this later in a browser tab i keep open for at least a year.
I’ll wait for the movie
