• Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This is why stuff like this should not be privately controlled and people and companies with more money and power than whole nations. It’s wrong and not supposed to allow this with laws against monopolies, but failed again and the rich do what they want.

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I am not sure about the “temporary” and “limited” though. Also, it is not just about Ukraine. The Russian regime obviously wants to talk about splitting up entire Europe between itself and the US, without anyone from the EU at the table, obviously.

      • TotalSonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Exactly, I think we are in agreement here - a truce handing Crimea, Donbas, and Luhansk to Russia as their newly undisputed territories would most certainly not create a political atmosphere stopping any future Russian actions over territories in Moldova, Georgia, Estonia and even into Latvia, Lithuania & Poland.

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Especially if part of the deal is a amputating NATO in all the countries Russia plans to invade next.

  • chleb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    22 hours ago

    another reason on why we should not trust and rely on big tech and should restrict their power.

        • M137@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          How do you not understand the meaning of the word nationalize?

          My gut reaction is that you’re American and the classic ignorant and dumb so you think Europe is a country.

          • MolochHorridus@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I didn’t and don’t care about the word nationalise in this case. the U.S.A has demonstrated it cannot be trusted. Midterms did not change that. No single nation should wield such power anyway.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Europe is not a country.

          Also having the EU run startlink for Ukraine seems like a terrible idea, support for Ukraine is wavering across several countries.

          I’d rather a specific nation that has shown willing to support Ukraine in the long run to run it, Sweden, Finland and Norway are good candidates.

          • Jiral@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            That kind of infrastructure is too massive for those countries. EU is the best bet. The EU will run it, but on behalf of its member states and a major stake holder is Poland. If Poland starts serving Russian interests all is lost anyway.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There’s other providers. ViaSat is one. Amazon Leo is another. So this is being announced as a message to Musk/Trump/Putin. But I don’t know, perhaps Trump has organized competitors be turned lff, or forbidden them?

    • MouldyCat@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’ve seen Eutelsat mentioned as a European competitor, wiki says they mostly handle TV transmissions but “also serve […] mobile communications, Internet backbone connectivity and broadband access for terrestrial, maritime and in-flight applications”.

      I’m not sure why they wouldn’t be able to provide Ukraine what they need, I don’t know if they are at the same technical level as starlink or not. That wiki page also says “As of March 2025, the company stated that it offers the same capacities as Starlink in Europe. However the operation of Eutelsat terminals is many times more expensive than that of Starlink.”

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Technically the US government does retain legal control over Starshield. Whether or not they have material control is unclear

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Of course they have material control. Musk doesn’t have a private army. Unfortunately the gov’t is working for and with Musk.

        • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Exactly. The Trump administration is fully responsible for this, legally and morally. And Republicans in Congress are also fully responsible, for failing to impeach Trump and Hegseth over this.

  • luckybart@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    If one was trying to pretend that Russia were in charge here, while not being too overt about it… How would they do this differently?

    It’s important to remember the baseline while the zone is flooded.