• ExLisperA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    People don’t just use computers for gaming. If this continues people will struggle to do any meaningful work on their personal computes which is definitely not good. And I’m not talking about browsing facebook but about coding, doing research, editing videos and other useful shit.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But wait! They can pay for remote computing time for a fraction of the cost! Each month. Forever.

      I fully expect personal computers to be phased out in favor of a remote-access, subscription model. AI popping would leave these big data centers with massive computational power available for use, plus it’s the easiest way to track literally everything you do on your system.

      • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        This is true but at the current computer prices, nowhere near as bad as it sounds. I spend £100/year or thereabouts for GeForce Now, and

        • there’s no way I could play games on a £500 laptop that I renew every 5 years,
        • no way that a £1000 laptop could get me to play AAA games for more than 1-2 years
        • and sure, I could play games on a £2000 laptop, but no way that will last me 20 years.

        If you have a life and can’t play any more than 25 hours a week, the value proposition right now is great - there’s no viable alternative that allows you to keep playing AAA games for the equivalent of £100/year.

        • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          Fuck, you almost sold me on GeForce Now. Owning is still a better value proposition for me because I get my games at… steep discounts.