That’s a lot of words for “I still don’t/won’t realize what your point is”. If you want to imagine enemies where there are none and waste energy argue against points no one you’re talking to is making, that’s your prerogative, but you’re not going to achieve much. Good luck with that.
Nope. Quotes don’t work like that either. You don’t get to just piecemeal the words in whatever order you want and claim “They literally said that!”.
Actual journalism deals with and communicates facts without distortion. Sometimes that’s a “parrot job”, and many times that includes personal insight, but it can never compromise on accuracy in reporting what actually happened. That’s lazy, unprofessional, and a threat to the medium as a whole. Similarly, you insisting falsehood is “fact” doesn’t make it so. It just erodes any credibility or merit your words carry, weakening your future statements that much more. You discredit yourself and everyone else that shares your stance.
And, again, nothing I’ve said has anything to do with what she meant. I’m not saying your claims of her intent are wrong. This has nothing to do with “deniability” or “legalese”, and trying to frame my point with some sort of counter-agenda is entirely unfitting.
For what an actually credible title could look like -
Harris Likens Trump to “communist dictators”
Accurate, and even shorter. Took me all of 2 seconds. Whoever wrote the title of the article is a hack that’s not worth the effort being put in to defend here.
Threatened them, bragged about it, then threatened others. What a slimy piece of shit.
For someone so against meaningless arguments, you are quite insistent on continuing the argument about things I’m not talking about. For the fourth time now - it doesn’t matter what she meant. Quotes in journalism (especially in headlines) are for verbatim statements, not paraphrased inferences.
Your inference on what she meant doesn’t change what she literally said.
She literally didn’t.
We used to compare the strength of our democracy to communist dictators. That’s what we’re dealing with right now in Donald Trump.
Can it be presumed it’s what she meant? Arguably. But presumptions are not quotes, and it’s not acceptable to attribute a quote to someone that didn’t say the words you are claiming they did.
Misleading, editorialized title. Any worthwhile journalist wouldn’t quote somebody on words they didn’t literally say.
From what I hear he was a turd before the stroke, too.
“Look what you made meBibi do!” Fucking victim blaming pos.
Not specifically him, but…yeah, pretty much. Lynchings typically involve torture and bodily mutilation. They don’t want to “just” kill someone, they want to send a message. Hiding it as something else kind of defeats the purpose.
Congrats to Ireland.
They’ve made intelligence offensive to their in-group. They’re proud to be unintelligent, and just the insinuation that something is “too smart” let’s them know it’s to be attacked.
It’s a play on “head honcho”, a very commonly used term.
I’d be off that plane so fast
Yeah, but then you gotta watch out for all those little Rube Goldberg death traps coming for you for like, forever. Is that really a life worth living?
Sounds like the main issue was the pharamcist. Anti-science nutjob should lose their license.
Decided to take a look at who was there and two names jumped out to me:
Jamie Siminoff of Ring - Not particularly surprising, but notable for a company becoming ubiquitous for personal home surveillance.
Lisa Su of AMD - Maybe I shouldn’t be surprised, but I was really hoping there’d be a gpu choice that wasn’t outright throwing their lot in with fascists.
2019 Navy SEAL raid [into North Korea].
Not the same boat attack. Not that his answer would probably be any different.
From what I can find, BC takes 15% for most sales, 10% for high-sellers. Dunno if that’s good or bad, but it seems low to me.
Swing and a miss.