And then they turned over the piece of paper and James Cameron had scrawled $lave$ and, well, you know the rest of the story…

Weird, I thought I included at least a link to the post but maybe it dropped out posting from another instance. Sorry about that. I usually do include links.

Fkn guy has never learned the concept of draft versions not that having a spine of silly putty helps.

I couldn’t care less about the MBFC rating

It’s useful. They have useful and pertinent information.

I’ve seen some sensationalist stuff from the source before, have been avoiding it too.

So, not a great source?

This source in a nutshell: The Canary is considered Generally unreliable. See § Summary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources/all/The_Canary

Overall, we rate The Canary Left biased based on story selection and editorial positions that strongly favor the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to a failed fact check and consistent one-sided reporting that favors a progressive left perspective.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-canary-uk/

They could easily drop the words twitter and account from that headline