• cylon@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    12 days ago

    Memory is cheap and data sells enough to many parties. Most apps are just store front for Ads and data collection.

    No wonder why open source apps are quite light.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 days ago

    Because companies give zero fucks. They will tell you they need tons of IT people, when in reality they want tons of underpaid programmers. They want stuff as fast and cheap as possible. What doesn’t cause immediate trouble is usually good enough. What can be patched up somehow is kept running, even when it only leads you further up the cliff you will fall off eventually.

    Management is sometimes completely clueless. They rather hire twice as many people to keep some poorly developed app running, than to invest in a new, better developed app, that requires less maintenance and provides a better user experience. Zero risk tolerance and zero foresight.

    It still generates money, you keep it running. Any means are fine.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 days ago

    Oh, they have new functionality. It’s all in the back end, detailing everything you do and sending it to the parent company so they can monetize your life.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 days ago

    It’s just that we have to make space for our 5,358 partners and the telemetry data they need.

  • Gxost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    It’s all because of Electron, unnecessary libraries, and just bad coders. Asus Armoury Crate weighs a lot and is so slow, but it’s basically a simple app. Total Commander has much more features, but it’s fast, lightweight, and consumes 9 MB of RAM.

  • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Cheaper & faster development by leveraging large libraries/frameworks, but inability to automatically drop most unused parts of those libraries/frameworks. You could in theory shrink Electron way down by yoinking out tons of browser features you’re not using, but there’s not much incentive to do it and it’d potentially require a lot of engineering work.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yep. Apps are 20x bigger with no new features…that you are using.

      Let’s not forget that the graphics for applications has scaled with display resolution, and people generally demand a smooth modern look for their apps.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        In the case of normal apps like PayPal graphics shouldn’t be a huge factor since it should be vectorized and there is pretty much no graphics in apps like PayPal.

        The issue comes from frameworks.

    • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah, though the joke is funny, this is the real answer.

      Storage is cheap compared to creating custom libraries.

      • Tanoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Also the storage is the cost for the user, and google in the case of play store. So the developers have no incentive to reduce the size.

  • enemenemu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    Paypal has 500 mb and just shows a number and you can press a button to send a number to their server.

    It’s insane

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’d argue that deploying from one codebase to 3+ different platforms is new functionality, although not for the end user per se.

    I wish though that more of the web apps would come as no batteries included (by default or at least as a selectable option), i.e. use whatever webview is available on the system instead of shipping another one regardless of if you want it or not.

  • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    The hp printer app says it needs your location to connect to WiFi. It says it needs your location all the time when not using the app, again to connect to WiFi

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I think that’s to do with how permissions work.

      Having wi-fi access can technically tell the app where you’re located so you need to give it location access

      Which is stupid because it then also gets GPS access.

  • x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Lazy devs not removing old non functional commented code and background code additions ?

    Though I do get it if they don’t want to remove the old code if their employer is an asshole