• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 days ago

      I think one of the reasons I liked Rogue One was that it’s “win condition” wasn’t “every one lived happily ever after”. although I will say, if you have enough time to find a beach and make out, you probably have enough tome to find a shuttle, or something.

      (the other reason I liked Rogue One was Alan Tudyk as K2-S0)(okay, actually, that’s why I loved Rogue One. Sue me.)

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s good to have one movie be different, but if every movie was like that, it would be boring and depressing.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          so all the other movies where all the action follows a set pattern… are not boring and depressing?

      • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I loved the ending of Rogue One, saw it in the cinema too (I don’t really watch new Star Wars movies).

        I am fan of the director, Gareth Edwards, Monsters (2010) was such a good indie sci-fi experience.

  • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yea, this is true, if you just ignore literally everything else about superhero genre pieces, the themes and allegories that are being presented through storytelling, and only pay attention to the surface level spectacle.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      Every book be like “This is a protagonist, they have a conflict”. Why can’t they just be original?!

    • gurnu@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I think you’re giving too much credit to superhero movies, it’s not like they’re doing anything new, just churning money from simpletons

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    An average of 3 per year starting from 2003. By 2011 it was an average of 5 superhero movies per year. Currently we’re on 6 a year.

    I find it interesting that this seems to overlap with the period of Trump’s rise to power.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Well, you do have two competing media empires turning them out looking for $$$. Warner vs. Disney. And the odd outsider…

      So far this year we have:

      Disney:

      Captain America: Brave New World $200,500,001

      Thunderbolts* $189,945,847

      Fantastic Four – July 25, 2025

      Warner:

      Superman $155,045,310

      Sony:

      Kraven the Hunter $3,110,836

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    If you want to be this simplistic, you could also apply this to the Matrix, Die Hard, at least 3 Star Wars films, most od the James Bond series, and basically every action movie made between 1991 and 1999.