• lunarul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    If you’re not very familiar with JS, watch the Wat talk before taking the quiz to know what to expect from this wonderful language.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          How? It’s easy not to run into the common issues by using TS. What’s so bad about it that we should throw away the existing ecosystem?

          Please give arguments instead of platitudes.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          It unquestionably is excellent. Can you name another language in common use with a type system that’s close to the expressiveness of Typescript?

          • expr@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Typescript has a decent type system, but it’s hardly state of the art. It’s impressive how they’ve managed to mostly corral JavaScript into something much more sane, but at the end of the day it still suffers greatly from the limitations of JavaScript. They’ve essentially retrofitted some type theory onto JavaScript to make it possible to express JavaScript nonsense in the type system, but there’s plenty of things that would have been designed differently had they been making something from scratch. Not to mention that the type system is unsound by design, which by itself puts it behind languages designed from the ground up to have sound type systems.

            There’s many, many things missing from the type system, like higher-kinded types, type-driven deriving/codegen, generalized algebraic data types (aka GADTs), type families (and relatedly, associated types), existentially-quantified types, and much more.

  • Macallan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    I got a 4/28 and got told I would have scored higher if I guessed at random. Ouch. (I am not a dev)

  • Thinker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    Thank god Temporal is finally in Stage 3, and already rolled out in Firefox. I can’t wait to be done with JS’s Date forever.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    This is just a good reminder of human nature to make bad choices (using JS) and stick with them forever.

  • brb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Except for some reason “2” is interpreted as a month, and the year is set to 2001.

    Aight I’m out