• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah, this is part of the new Reaganomics I like to call AIconomics. The goal isn’t to produce a good product, the goal to make something flashy that tech billionaires want to throw cash at. It’s not unlike crypto. Crypto has literally no actual value yet people are shitting money into bitcoins of every type in hopes that one will hit it big. Meanwhile tech billionaires keep minting new ones to entice new suckers every other week. The tech billionaires want you hooked on AI so you’ll give up your private info that they can sell to each other so they can cash in, the software companies are investing their time and resources into making AI LLMs in order to get tech billionaires to give them money. It’s a viscous capitalist circle. Only thing that will stop it is heavy regulation. But with Republicans in charge that will absolutely never happen. Trump practically made his entire cabinet out of billionaires and corporate shills. And too many Democrats gave them the thumb up, so don’t count of Dems doing a whole lot to stall the big tech chokehold on everything either.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Crypto has literally no actual value yet people are shitting money into bitcoins of every type in hopes that one will hit it big.

      That’s not entirely correct. Black and white stones used in voting in someplace antique also have no actual value, but they substitute a vote.

      BTC is used as a mechanism of exchange, like a decentralized bank.

      Only thing that will stop it is heavy regulation.

      Would you agree if someone told you that the only thing to resolve some political problem is heavy artillery?

      Or would you doubt that the person talking has good idea of the problem and the solutions, offering the bluntest one?

      “Regulation” of the “property rights protection” kind is needed. Providing a service presented as a good that doesn’t work without dancing to a certain tune is simply cheating, it’s theft. Providing a “communication platform” augmenting and weighing your words for recommendation system leading to some intended effect is cheating, theft and impersonation at the same time. These should be prosecuted. But that’s not heavy regulation, that’s an update to pretty light regulation.

      Maybe also obligation for every big service on the Internet to have global identifiers and provide a global API exposing all its inner entities, be that posts or users or comments or reactions, with those global identifiers. So that you could export all of Facebook to a decentralized cache, for example. That’s heavy regulation, but also pretty reasonable, in line with old approaches to libraries, press and freedom of speech.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sadly I am running into more and more things that don’t work on firefox. Stuff like medical record portals, financial websites for my companies retirement plan. Stuff I have little choice about. And most fail silently. They don’t say it is the browser. I don’t know how they are doing it, but google is winning the fight.

    • NoodlePoint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Stuff like medical record portals, financial websites for my companies retirement plan. Stuff I have little choice about. And most fail silently.

      I recall how South Korea literally painted itself into a corner for becoming too dependent on Internet Explorer after years of using it with a security implementation based entirely on ActiveX.

      I’m currently using a user-agent switcher plugin. Allows me to spoof servers into believing I’m running a different browser.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I tried the spoofer on a few, and they still failed. I thought it was supposed to be all chromium under the hood, but somehow it’s different. And companies don’t test firefox, nor care.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    So what do we do ? Go to Chromium & expand it’s monopoly ?

    FF forks like LibreWolf, IronFox, WaterFox etc… have to become their own thing via Servo, at least until we get LadyBird.

    There’s Seamonkey as well; which is an entire suite of apps bundled with a browser (Email, RSS, IRC etc…)

    • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      You could always use a WebKit-based browser. They’re still out there, and as they aren’t owned by a company that also sells web ads they are significantly more privacy focussed.

        • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The main browser to use WebKit these days is Safari. You’ll find that on macOS, iOS, and iPadOS. I’m guessing that would be why someone downvoted me (some people have strong feelings about Apple, even though WebKit is Open Source and is very highly privacy focussed).

          I had thought there were more options out there outside the Apple ecosystem, but it seems many of the browsers I once knew were using WebKit moved at some point to Blink (like Maxthon and Slepnir). The Gnome Epiphany browser for Linux however is built atop WebKit.

          There are others, but you’re not likely (or able) to use them on desktop systems. PlayStation’s Orbis OS for the PS4 and PS5 uses WebKit as its underlying browser engine, for example. And there is WPE that is intended for use in embedded system environments (like for digital signage).

          I did think there were more options out there (there once was!), but it seems a bunch of them moved to Blink when I wasn’t looking!

    • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I used basilisk for a short while. Very minimal browser, indeed.

      But it’s chromium, so you do you. I personally favour anything that doesn’t bloat me. Early on I used opera back on a j2me device, there was also a browser with a nice data saving feature, I had access to all cricket news and cricket sport teams because it was heaviliy featured there, there was a squirrel as a logo but it’s all I remember.

      Edit it was ucbrowser

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    For clarity, Mozilla isn’t one thing. There’s Mozilla Corporation (profit) and the Mozilla Foundation (nonprofit). Firefox is a product of Mozilla Corporation. And yes, the need to make a profit is a bug not a feature.

  • bigredcar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Firefox still hasn’t fixed Bug 1938998 despite me reporting it multiple times. There’s a reason why Firefox is almost non existent on mobile. I’ve been using the internet for 26 years, and have used Mozilla based browsers since 2001, I want them to survive to the next era of the internet, but they are struggling to keep up. Opera and Edge already gave up their engines, Webkit and Blink are basically the same engine with different standards enabled, and Firefox is under 2% on some days on Statcounter. I feel that soon AI based browsers using their own AI-engine will probably take over the internet soon anyway.

    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I use Firefox on mobile all the time. Works fine for me. The fact that I get adblock on mobile makes it a no-brainer to use over chrome.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    The fact that they are now selling our data seems like both a browser problem and a leadership problem. If the browser were fine, we wouldn’t be seeing a moderate exodus to choices like Librewolf and Zen.