These are what’s called stock photos. Photographers take thousands of these and sell them to companies to use in ads and other media.
Also important to note is that these stock images or the ads themselves that use them, may add weird errors on purpose as a way to psychologically ingrain the ad into your mind because you’ll remember the weird shit. I forgot what this practice is called, but it has a name.
Things like the peas being upside down in this:
Lmao wtf
Fascinating
This looks completely normal to me, nothing about this appears to be AI.
Maybe a better question is who cares?
This is one of these cases where it’s probably better to use AI. I don’t even understand why people even have to be in these picture frames. “Ohhhh so that’s what i could put in these things.”
it’s actually my 10yo daughter who sent me this image and asked me if it’s AI. I’m teaching her to be on the lookout for ai generated images so that she can stay vigilant and not fall for scams using ai images to create a narrative.
So what’s your conclusion? Is it AI or not, what criteria did you use to make that determination?
I think it’s not AI. I still have one or two suspects (like the bottom left and top right wearing the same dress, but the big yellow flower on the bottom one has two leaves coming out, but the top one seems to have one leaf and one stem coming out, but it could also just be a wrinkle), but for the most part, the details seem to be too consistent to be AI
I would have uploaded some of images to Tineye and let that website tell me.
And that’s how AI will win lol. So many things are seen as inconsequential. But a photographer for a stock photo company is a job to be cut due to AI. So, you probably should.
You can’t legislate against progress.
I just found out shows like 90 Day Fiance have been playing AI music for years so nothing would surprise me
Looks wonky enough for me to believe they’re fakes.
Not trying to be mean, but when’s the last time you spent any time with a kid around that age? My toddler is doing things along those lines with her hands in every picture I have of her.
Things like missing fingers? I don’t think you quite understand what they were getting at.
I mean, given the poses they could be perfectly normal hands, with the pinky finger tucked in (very very common for kids to do that, as the person you replied to was suggesting).
Good catch!
Look at the hands.
Column 2, row 4. Left hand (from our perspective) has 4 fingers, right hand has 6 fingers (notice the lifted one behind the flower)
People have gone so far down the rabbit hole of trying to assert pictures are AI, theyve started false flagging normal pictures.
For the above pic, her right thumb is obviously just down… obviously holding the plant in her hand.
Her left hand is normal, thats her arm behind the flower you mis-identified as a finger.
Bruh chill, I’m only human. I said what I believe is correct based on what I’m seeing. The pictures are really blurry and it’s hard to know for sure anyway, even you’re just guessing but asserting it as absolute truth. I’m sure if you reverse image search and go full detective you might figure more out but I don’t care that much.
I think the one behind the flower is the armpit. The thumb on the other hand might be holding the stem on he other side of he index finger. That said, that seems to be a weird extra strip of clothing on the hand behind the flower
You mean the other flowers?
That said, that seems to be a weird extra strip of clothing on the hand behind the flower
This is the white head(?) of one of the flowers she is holding not a strip of clothing
yeah you’re right, it’ blends with the background, but I see the stem.
the lifted one is not a finger but part of her upper arm. I don’t think this is AI.
I think where the flower pattern doesn’t match, one of the photos is flipped horizontally
