• fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 month ago

      $10 says it’s a “repurposed” sex hot and it would’ve taken a whopping week for a more techy student to hack it and say profanities or something similar…

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is interesting that they couldn’t replace sex workers with their unskilled robots, but they think they can replace teachers!?

        These companies are so out of touch with reality that they deserve to go bankrupt. Their investors are so out of touch that they deserve to loose their investment.

  • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    1 month ago

    pauses plan

    In other words, “We’re gonna wait until people forget about this, then do it anyway.”

    • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sex bots being deployed as public school teachers is so fucked up even fiction authors wouldn’t touch it.

      Like ffs this is so dystopian it’s one of those things they don’t put in the history movie 200 years later because it’s unbelievable

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Right before the AI boom really started to take off there was a robot “companion” named Moxie that I thought struck exactly the right balance - it was nowhere near the uncanny valley, staying firmly on the cute robot side, and it used a projected cartoon face that was simple but expressive. Unfortunately the company’s timing was rather poor, they went out of business right before the AI back end would have been able to make full use of an avatar like this. I’d love to see another version of this approach.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t know, Moxie feels like a DreamWorks character popped inside of a plastic casing. Especially with that image, it comes across like a render or a movie character than a real thing.

        Personally, I’m more partial to robots that don’t have a human-like face at all. Like Jibo, whose “face” was a simple flat circle on a screen. Cosmo might be the upper end, where it has two “eyes” (squares) on a screen, but no other features.

        IMO there’s a bit of a mistake in trying to have human faces on robots. Not only do you then have to contend with the uncanny valley, but you don’t really need those to convey the same thing. Pose and things like that work equally as well.

        We don’t have people walking around trying to put human faces on cats and dogs, but we can understand them well enough all the same.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yup. IIRC they paid the movie’s producers for the product placement, and then the company went under before the movie’s release date. So it ended up advertising a defunct product. But at least it fit perfectly into the movie’s plot.

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is absolutely pathetic. Love the way they have no idea what to do with their arms, but desperately try to do something anyway, at a glacial pace, I assume because any faster could throw them off-balance… And they just end up stuck in the most awkward, unnatural poses anyway.

  • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    30% of the country already acts like they were taught by a brainless joytoy and are no doubt going to say shit like yowza I wish my 3rd grade teacher looked like that .

    This half decade is really the official start of america as a cyberpunk dystopia and I gotta say its way fuckin stupider than I imagined.

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      The clanker in the pic is from a CES demo. I did not see whose skin the classroom terminator is supposed to wear but it is supposed to have dark hair.

  • 001Guy001@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not good regardless of the connection to sex bots. It means classrooms would be monitored to make sure teachers and kids “behave” and don’t pose any risk to the establishment by straying from the curriculum into conversations that question the status quo. And it would allow creeps to spy on kids and gather information on them.

    • homik@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      And since it’s corporate property, you can just bill for damage and replacement and maintenance and don’t need to deal with human issues.

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    I bet that a bunch of techy kids would just hack in to them or destroyed them lmao