• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 days ago

    Around 1 million New York Democrats showed up to vote, the highest raw total in a city primary since 1989, before Mamdani was born.

    Weird…

    Almost like giving people a candidate they agree with, makes them more likely to vote…

    • jeffw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      There’s also 1 million more people than in 1989 and (I think?) a larger portion of NYCers are registered dems now. So that’s not actually that good. We should break turnout records every year if our population grows.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        Fair, I always want turnout by percentage of total voters, because percent of total voters in each party is a big part of it.

        A candidate that grows the party shouldn’t have their accomplishments reduced because they drive turnout.

        We don’t live in an ideal word, most people don’t even vote in generals.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Why do people keep talking about candidates like they’re gifts?

      He won a PRIMARY. We get progressives in NY primaries ALL THE TIME. The only difference with Mamdani’s win is that WE SHOWED UP.

      This is how we take control of our Congress. Vote. In. Primaries.

  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 days ago

    You know they’re shitting themselves. Progressive successes pose more of a threat to incumbent Democrats than Republican successes