• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 minutes ago

    Doesn’t this thing just run android and Google App Store? What a waste of decent hardware.

  • FG_3479@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I love the idea but the price is too high for the chip given that this is designed to be a lengevity phone. A chip like the 7s Gen 3 would make the phone sluggish after a couple of years with how unoptimised todays apps are.

    The Gorilla Glass 7i and IP55 water resistance are also concerning given that budget Samsung, Xiaomi, etc phones beat this.

    However having components of the phone being easily replacable is a great thing.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I would totally buy one of these if they were sold in the US. Sadly, last time I checked the newest phone wasn’t sold here. So I doubt this one will be.

  • Joeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If they are all about swappable parts, and being able to upgrade your phone how you want … Shouldn’t this just be a module upgrade… Of the main part? Maybe I don’t understand it … At the very least the old parts should work with the new system right? Unless something major has changed.

  • philthi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Fuck these guys… Seriously. I bought a phone off of them hyped at the idea of the ethics. It didn’t work on arrival. Over 3 months later and not one single reply to my helpdesk request (other than the Automated acknowledgement of receipt).

    Unbelievably bad user experience, I went from hyped at the concept of reducing my production of electronic waste to beyond disappointed at a brutally bad user experience.

    Then to make matters worse, it is difficult to source spare parts for the fairphone 4 (according to a friend of mine who owns one that he bought a while ago)… Like is that not the entire point of the phone, reduced consumption of new phones by supporting repairs. If you’re going to stop producing the spares at least release the patents then… if you really believe in the promoted ideals that you spout… Which they clearly do not.

    It turns out that it’s just another money hungry company hell bent on burning the planet down to see a line go up, as far as I’m concerned. All gaff to sell shite phones at higher prices.

    Do not buy.

      • philthi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        In terms of fp4 replacement parts, I am only quoting a friend of mine, I haven’t personally looked into that; though I was ready to believe it after my experience.

  • razen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They don’t have Auto in Screen Refresh Rare but shouldn’t it be there if they LTPO display?

  • adr1an@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    There’s a deGoogled version too!!

    I would prefer GrapheneOS (If I can live with the irony of getting a Pixel phone just to deGoogle it…). Sandboxing there is way better. But you lose the Repairability… Gotta check and compare the new EU metrics too.

    They are just two different devices.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Interesting that they seem to be using a consumer grade Snapdragon chip this time, typically they used weird chips ment for industry applications if I’m not mistaken. Wonder what sparked the change, did Qualcomm start supporting their chips for longer?

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Fairphone has really gone off the deep end. 6 phone models in what? less than 12 years? That’s what they call dedication to sustainability? Really? They used to say the most sustainable phone is your old phone, assuming you can continue to use it. Yet - my Fairphone 1, still in good working order hardware-wise, I had to “scrap” because no more SW updates. When my FP2 hardware (charging port) eventually failed, they no longer sold the relevant spare parts.

    What good are exchangeable parts, if they are removed from the shop around the time that a well-treated phone might need them?

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    600 euros? That’s like 700 USD

    Remind me again, wasn’t like 80% of the American population on the verge of poverty and homelessness if a 500 USD emergency happened?

    Who’s benefiting from this?

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This is nice for Europe I guess, and I want to like the fairphone, but unfortunately it’s not viable for me.

    Besides basic phone features and the ability to run Android apps I have 3 requirements, 2 of which the fairphone fails at. I need it to be usable in the US on my phone carrier. I need to be able to use Google Pay or another mobile payment alternative (that’s accepted in most stores). Finally it needs to have at least a 48 hour battery life.

    Fairphone unfortunately doesn’t work in the US with most carriers, and the one that kills not only it but all the de-googled phones, it doesn’t support mobile payment of any kind. I’ve done a ton of research trying to find some kind of fix for that second point because I’d gladly use something like GrapheneOS if I could, but every time the answer I come to is it’s just not possible.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Don’t worry, it fails in Europe too. I ended up giving away my FP4, because it fails to do even basic stuff like make a call after 3G was switched off in my country.

      Worst phone I ever had, with quite a margin. And the only one I ever kept for under 2 years and the only one I replaced while it was still physically ok.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’d love one and have checked back each year after their first model, but they still don’t sell to Australia - and I’m not going to buy something I can’t get direct parts and services for, and would need to go through third parties for.

    If their model is a successful business I honestly thought they would have expanded beyond shipping/supporting only Europe by now, its been a decade since their first model. Maybe they’re still not a very big player / modest success?

  • Corhen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I know people complain about big phones, but as a 6’5" guy i LOVE my big screens, and i think i’d struggle with a 6.3" screen. I have a 22U i plan to use for another year or two, and would go larger if i could.

  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Is it me or did they get slightly more vague on their marketing materials, wrt the environmental impact ( at least compared to fp5 ) ?

    Also the battery seems a bit harder to replace, as you now need a screwdriver. It does appear to be more flush, so it may be due to size constraints.

    Edit: and there’s “more” replaceable parts because the back is split in two. That split might prove better for durability tho, because pulling the back on their older phones felt like it would break every time.