• CombatWombat@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hate everything about this. We’re ruining our astronomical observations and risking Kessler Syndrome so a trillionaire can price gouge rural internet subscribers because he wants to get the high score on net worth because he can’t get a high score on twitter likes (despite owning it) or any video game (despite having paid help). Who the hell told the United States that we have regulatory authority over our shared sky anyway?

  • Sineljora@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you use starlink, you deserve far worse. 5g is usually sufficient unless you’re out in the ocean or something. Either way it’s ruining the night sky, making launches more dangerous, destroying the ozone layer we tried so hard to repair, and supporting death and fascism.

    • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      destroying the ozone layer

      This made me ask “wait, is that true” and apparently it is. Super, skin cancer for everyone. 🤦

        • Wioum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I wonder if wooden satellites would help. I don’t know how capable they are compared to normal ones, but it should reduce the amount of aluminium we launch into space.

      • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        And it’ll take ages to have an impact too.

        Furthermore, we find that these reentry byproducts may take up to 30 years to settle from the top of the mesosphere into the stratospheric ozone layer. Upon reaching an altitude of about 40 km, aluminum oxides catalyze chlorine activation which promotes ozone depletion.

        So the “reentry byproducts” from a satellite re-entering now, won’t start breaking down ozone until 2056, and by then there will be another 30 years’ worth of byproducts deposited in the upper atmosphere.

        And since it’s a catalyst, it won’t even be consumed in the process like CFCs are.

      • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Fortunately in my area in Australia we have wireless broadband. There are small towers installed and operated by a local company that provide a good service. The whole lot of towers interconnect using microwave too so can span a large area. In any case, fibre isn’t coming to my place probably ever.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    The corporate version of privatize the profits, socialize the costs. Get in bed with billionaires and you’re an enemy of humanity.

  • paydequeso@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve been having occasional Internet issues over the last few years and was thinking about having a backup ISP.

    A lot of people in my town suggest Starlink… And well, I’d rather not have Internet at all!

    However, I did recently find these guys: https://www.computers4people.org/shield I’m gonna give these guys a shot.

    It’s probably not comparable, but no way in hell am I ever signing up for Starlink.

    • JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think that makes a lot of sense, it would be nice if they clarified if you could BYO router. My guess is you can, as long as it has a sim slot, but can’t be too sure. Make sure T-Mobile coverage is good in your area first as well

    • adarza@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      https://www.pcsforpeople.org/ is another organization with low-cost internet for low income households. they some have hardware, too. they’ve expanded a lot since their first location opened in minnesota in 1998. (note: i am not affiliated with them, i just occasionally refer people to them)

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Elon Musk Is Charging Starlink Customers Gigantic Bogus Fees Because Its Network Is Being Crushed by [Musk’s] “High Demand” for more money

    FTFY

    • Widdershins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Elon Musk Is Charging Starlink Customers Gigantic Bogus Fees Because Its Network Is Being Crushed by [Musk’s] “High Demand” for more money ketamine

      FTFTFY

  • bfg9k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lol. Lmao, even.

    Skimping out on backbone capacity is definitely a Musk move 😂

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    So if you’re out on a farm, what’s the best option for Internet? Is 3g an option? (Either unlimited or a very large amount) Any line of sight service good?

    • potpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Biden’s broadband equity program earmarked over $42MM to expand broadband; past admins were incentivizing telecom to take action, but lo and behold, doge slashed a gutted to move funding toward starlink.

      Is there any source of high speed internet? You could look into a community mesh network.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        You would be very surprised how many rural areas have barely-working cellular networks that are unreliable and not fast enough for usable data.

    • Dave.@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you’re out on a farm, you fit the intended use case for starlink.

      The issue is that all them city folk see starlink as a way of escaping the locked in municipal ISPs. So they clog up satellite bandwidth when they have fibre/5G/HFC/wireless/xDSL options literally at their front door.

    • black0ut@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Depends on the place. In a lot of countries, the countryside has complete coverage of 3G and 4G. There are also places with at least coax, and even fiber.

      In places like the US, companies like Starlink have lobbied so that no cable is installed and no nationwide 3G/4G coverage exists (5G coverage would be near impossible due to the limitations of the technology).

      Imho we should be focusing on running cable everywhere instead of trying to maintain a massive network of thousands of satellites in LEO. It’s probably cheaper in the long run, and it doesn’t ruin scientific observations or the ozone layer.

  • amazingly101@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Violence against billionaires and trillionaire is not the answer. It is the question. And the answer IS YES.