• ynthrepic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    This is such an American response.

    If conflict escalates with an armed vigilante uprising, it will be used by Trump to justify everything the military does, which will include live rounds on civilian targets. An armed militia cannot compete with the military.

    The only way victory (hopefully through a mutual desire not to have a civil war) is possible is if state national guard and police remain loyal to their local governor and vow to fight against the federal government on the people’s behalf. But that’s still massively risky.

    The best thing as always otherwise is a large scale non-violent protest. Bigger and more persistent than the No Kings protests.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Pushing it to that point is the most likely way to get the military to fracture. Which is the only realistic way to win this by force. Not saying force is the only way, but if it is the way, you need to force a split.

      • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        If they open fire on unarmed civilians fracture is much more likely than if they open fire on an armed milita. I’m just looking to encourage avoiding giving the authoritarian side any excuse to claim the higher ground.