• MrTrono@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    I keep seeing this but the claim is dubious at best and feel like conflating correlation with causation. While the examples cited were largely non violent they had aspects and sub movements advocating violence and destruction, so any outcomes cannot be isolated in a way to make this claim.

    • Jesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      She doesn’t claim that you need to hit 3.5% and then you’re magically able to overthrow an authoritarian government.

      She notes that disciplined nonviolent resistance, focused around a concise and relatable message, is a characteristic of successful movements. And that turnout number is a common artifact of movement who are focused, strategic, and disciplined. The number in and of itself is not the goal.