Innerworld@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoBrit mathematician lets AI agent loose with credit card – cue password leaks, CAPTCHA chaos and morewww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up1122
arrow-up1122external-linkBrit mathematician lets AI agent loose with credit card – cue password leaks, CAPTCHA chaos and morewww.theregister.comInnerworld@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square19linkfedilink
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·3 months agoHuh, this borders on plagiarism. This article is essentially a transcription of this video https://youtu.be/WnzR5aOElvw
minus-squarechemical_cutthroat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·3 months agoAlso, how are you gonna plagiarize Hannah Fry? She’s the fucking best.
minus-squareBromeliadventures@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoWould that not make her more likely to be plagiarised? Why would you plagiarise a boring idiot, what would be the point?
minus-squarechemical_cutthroat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoIt’s more of a “the audacity…”, not a “why would you…”
minus-squaregasgiant@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 months agoThe article is about Professor Hannah Fry’s work. That would be the same Professor Hannah Fry in the video…
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoThe article is essentially a text version of that video.
minus-squaregasgiant@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoOk. Still not plagiarism though. They’ve referred to the original author and credited their work. Other post is correct. At worst it’s lazy clickbaiting.
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months agoThats why I’m saying borders on. I know it’s not technically plagiarizing, but they really did just lift the video into text form and call it their own article. Yes they credit her, but what did they actually add themselves?
Huh, this borders on plagiarism.
This article is essentially a transcription of this video https://youtu.be/WnzR5aOElvw
Also, how are you gonna plagiarize Hannah Fry? She’s the fucking best.
Would that not make her more likely to be plagiarised? Why would you plagiarise a boring idiot, what would be the point?
It’s more of a “the audacity…”, not a “why would you…”
The article is about Professor Hannah Fry’s work.
That would be the same Professor Hannah Fry in the video…
The article is essentially a text version of that video.
Ok. Still not plagiarism though. They’ve referred to the original author and credited their work.
Other post is correct. At worst it’s lazy clickbaiting.
Thats why I’m saying borders on. I know it’s not technically plagiarizing, but they really did just lift the video into text form and call it their own article.
Yes they credit her, but what did they actually add themselves?