- Nick Clegg, former Meta executive and UK Deputy Prime Minister, has reiterated a familiar line when it comes to AI and artist consent.
- He said that any push for consent would “basically kill” the AI industry.
- Clegg added that the sheer volume of data that AI is trained on makes it “implausible” to ask for consent.
If abiding to the law destroys your business then you are a criminal. Simple as.
If I ran the zoo, then any AI that trained on intellectual property as if it were public domain would automatically become public domain itself.
If your industry can’t exist without theft then your industry doesn’t deserve to exist, pretty simple.
I have a proposition. Raid them with police and search their computers for stolen data like you would do with your citizens.
Good, I think it should be killed.
if something so simple can kill an entire industry, that industry should not exist.
If being declined concent is going to kill your industry then maybe your industry deserved to die.
Fucking rapist mentaility right there.
My thought exactly. If consent isn’t needed, what other actions do they deem justified without consent?
This is not a IP-issue, this is about human rights.
If a business cannot survive without breaking the law, then it is not a business but a criminal organisation.
oh noes
Look, these goddamn assholes have got in their head that they have a right to profit.
NOBODY HAS A RIGHT TO PROFIT.
You have a right to try to create a profit and there are rules to that. You’re gonna lose your billions in investment if you can’t plaigerize content?..fuck you, your loss, and you shoulda fucking known better when the idea was presented to you.
Assholes
So they want to be able to benifit from free art while the rest of us have to pay to access it? Seems fair. /s
Same thing for most of billionaires’ income sources.
“Respecting [insert human right] would kill [insert industry].”
Bank robbers say laws against bank robbery will kill bank robbery.
correction: will kill people’s attempts to make billions out of other people’s art. Otherwise inquisitive people will continue to do non-profit research this way or another.
Actually here is a question to you: Would you be ok if the law stated you don’t need permission if it is non-profit and open source? Yea I thought so bitch.
