• I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hey, I know we’re dunking on Vance, but you should really try reading the Bible before making that claim. What you find might surprise you.

    • Oyml77@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Point taken. I’m not a religious guy and I’m sure there’s plenty of old testament scripture that supports smiting the non-believers (which christophiles always point to as to why muslims are so gosh-darn violent), but Jesus was a lot more on the side of promoting peace than war, which was kind of the point the pope was trying to make. I don’t believe any of it, but Vance claims to, and it is clear to me he just doesn’t understand what he claims to believe.

      That was really my only point and I guess I wasn’t really very clear about it

      • insufferableninja@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Do not think I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a person’s enemies will be those of his own household.

        • JC, Matthew 10:34-36

        Edit: fix typo

    • Sirdubdee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what the catechism is for. It’s already been interpreted and for Catholics. The Bible is just backstory full of plot holes.