• qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s ascribing human motivations to non-humans. They could be fundamentally non-curious, only using their relative intelligence to solve actual problems in their environment rather than pushing for “what if?”.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you have a species that doesn’t feel a drive to explore they would never leave the place they evolved, then they would be at high risk of extinction when their climate changed with plate tectonics

        And perhaps it’s the drive to explore that has humans exploring ideas

        Maybe you need to be like us to get into space

        • qarbone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Most people don’t feel the need to kill someone, but if their life depended on it, they’d kill in self-defense.

          You’re conflating the “need” with the “ability”.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I wasn’t talking about need or ability, only exposing themselves to extra risk, failing to discover important discoveries because they don’t explore ideas. I’m sure I wasn’t perfectly clear.