• qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s ascribing human motivations to non-humans. They could be fundamentally non-curious, only using their relative intelligence to solve actual problems in their environment rather than pushing for “what if?”.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you have a species that doesn’t feel a drive to explore they would never leave the place they evolved, then they would be at high risk of extinction when their climate changed with plate tectonics

      And perhaps it’s the drive to explore that has humans exploring ideas

      Maybe you need to be like us to get into space

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most people don’t feel the need to kill someone, but if their life depended on it, they’d kill in self-defense.

        You’re conflating the “need” with the “ability”.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I wasn’t talking about need or ability, only exposing themselves to extra risk, failing to discover important discoveries because they don’t explore ideas. I’m sure I wasn’t perfectly clear.