The moderator told me questions like this aren’t stupid and they’re the point of this community.
I want an answer.
That depends on whether the angels in question are bosons or fermions—which in turn depends on how they’re spinning (so the dance they’re performing may also be relevant).
ooh quantum angels! i love it when two things i can’t ever understand combine powers
I hope you love eyes too! Because they heavily invested in eyes.
“where we’re going, you won’t need eyes to see”
sorry, not relevant, but it made me think of this line from Event Horizon, which was the only horror movie that has ever actually frightened me.
Can jesus microwave a burrito so hot that even he couldn’t eat it?
Not enough info. What wattage of microwave? What size and filling of the burrito? Is he allowed to drink water and/or wine between bites? Have you recently modified the DNS settings on the microwave?
This is gonna turn into a dumb shitpost community, isn’t it?
It already is. That was the whole point of this post.
Yesterday a moderator told me that it was not a stupid question to ask if a ship can fit in a Klein bottle.
So I’m basically trolling. I’m leaving this community if the mods don’t step up.
It’s gotten totally out of hand.
I appreciate the troll. It’s always bugged me that this community took the name from reddit without the actual theme. This place should be for “common sense” questions you feel stupid having to ask but instead it’s mostly been ELI5, asklemmy, and a variety of loaded questions.
Right! “No stupid questions” isn’t just a cute saying, the intention behind it was to remove the shame people would carry for asking a question that they “should” already know the answer to.
It was never meant to solicit opinions, or to ask pointless questions that cannot be answered.
It’s time for this community to change, I’m not going to make a big poo poo about it, but I’m going to leave if something doesn’t happen. I can sense other people have had it as well.
I’d say since angels are imaginary, √-1 angels would fit on a pin head.
42
As many angels as actually exist.
It depends on how you define angel.
And “dance”, “on”, “the head of”, and “pin”.
“Can” weirdly enough doesn’t have sufficient variation to introduce uncertainty here.
Right answer should be none, zero. I have few friends named Angel (that is their first name) and none of them can dance.
What kind of Angel, would be a follow-up. There’s different kinds.
Yes
It’s just the one goose.
This was actually a Victorian parody question they invented to make fun of medieval philosophers. Nowadays we think Thomas Aquinas, etc. were making quite sophisticated points, albeit within the boundaries of the religious society of the time.
The right amount
7