• Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    15 days ago

    Many of these “business geniuses” do the following:

    • buy struggling business cheap
    • reduce expenses (biggest expense is always salaries, so fire a lot of people)
    • on paper, the business is making money (while the rest of the staff frantically try to survive without enough manpower and with a lot of loss on knowledge and experience)
    • sell doomed business before it collapses (remember: on paper, it looks healthy)
    • luciferofastora@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s a Bigger Idiot Scam: buy company, make it look valuable, sell it for profit to a bigger idiot, until someone is left holding the bag.

      Except that someone can usually still gut it, sell its assets and push the cost on those that weren’t lucky enough to land a new job ahead of time.

  • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    15 days ago

    I love that the guy’s tattoos change constantly:

    • snake on right arm
    • snake moves to the left arm
    • apple gets bite taken from it as snake is now a real creature

    So many little details in this comic!

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    15 days ago

    What… The heck… Is going on in that factory!? What’s with all the random changes and references?

    • Klear@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 days ago

      Not all slop is AI slop. You’re jumping at shadows, calm down.

        • Klear@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 days ago

          Certainly a minority, but not quite alone. I see comments like yours a LOT.

          Personally I’d prefer seeing people call out slop because it’s shitty, not based on how it was made, but with that I guess I’m the minority ¯\_(ツ)_¯

        • ramble81@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          15 days ago

          Possibly but it’s also because you’re not willing to admit you may be wrong with your view and adjusting accordingly. Instead you’re digging in further.

    • kboos1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 days ago

      Because there are random hands and faces all over the place, random cartoon characters and every frame had no connection with the next frame except the to foreground characters?

      This thing is chaos.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 days ago

        I think they are suggesting it does not appear to be drawn by a human.

        • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 days ago

          Im with you that the style looks pretty AI, and at first glance I assumed so too, but the little jokes and characters dotted around brought me back.

    • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      when claiming something is generated by AI, you should probably look at the image for more than 5 seconds and probably know what an AI generated comic looks like

      claiming something made by a real person is AI generated can be hurtful

    • mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      AI is pretty consistently bad at small background text and expressive hand gestures and this image has quite a lot of both.

      The box in the first panel is a good example. The text “caution: irrelevant prop” written on it becomes clearer when you zoom in; for things like that, AI usually makes sort of a word shaped tangle that turns to mush when you zoom in.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 days ago

    Thomas Pickety lays out the mechanics of this transference in Capitalism In The Twenty-First Century.

    He establishes a comparison between the domestic rate of economic growth (typically measured in GDP) relative to the average return on investment (typically measured by bond rates or annualized stock market asset inflation). He finds that when GDP < ROI, wealth aggregates into the hands of a small pool of elites. Meanwhile, when GDP > ROI, wealth diffuses to the general public (the so-called Trickle Down Economics promised by Reagan).

    These leveraged buyouts are only possible when private lenders can generate a compounding return in fictitious assets that outpaces a return investing in material capital and labor improvements. And the compounding return is, at its heart, a consequence of unpaid wages, bad debt, and unaccounted depreciation.

    Picketty concludes that the most straightforward remedy to rebalancing GDP and ROI is to tax capital gains. This effectively forces down the ROI, while redirecting cash flow to public investments that boost GDP without triggering an inflationary spiral.

    But what he can’t answer is how to address the social dynamic that allows taxes to fall and predatory business practices to accumulate. Media manipulation, imperialist plundering, and the exploitation of domestic lower social castes can’t be solved with tax policy. Who actually stops the Business Genius from wrecking the factory? What are the real material functions of the economy being controlled? And how do a handful of individuals successfully rent-seek from them without triggering a public revolt?