• SkepticalRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    AI isn’t going to destroy the world. But it will make it easier and faster for humanity to destroy the world.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    This is a thing on social media already.

    Lots of bad faith conservatives will just output AI garbage. They don’t care about truth, they just want to waste your time. You spend time researching their claims, providing counter evidence - they don’t care, because they don’t even read what you say, just copy and paste into an LLM.

    It’s very concerning with the Trump administrations attack on science. Science papers are disappearing, accurate/vetted information because sparser - then you can train Grok to claim that all trans women are rapists or that global warming is just Milkanovitch cycles.

    It is and has been an info war. An attack on human knowledge itself. And AI will be used to facilitate it.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It could also be an effective tool for liberation. Tools are like that. Just matters how they’re used and by whom.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      But they have to be used.

      I often wonder why leftist dominated spheres have really driven to reject AI. Given that were suppose to be more tech dominant. Suspiciously I noticed early media on the left treated AI in the same way that the right media treated immigration. I really believe there was some narrative building through media to introduce a point of contention within the left dominant spheres to reject AI and it’s usefulness

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I haven’t seen much support for antiAI narratives in leftist spaces. Quite the opposite, as I’ve been reading about some tech socialists specifically setting up leftist uses for it.

        But your instincts are spot on. The liberals are being funded by tech oligarchs who want to monopolize control of AI, and have been aggressively lobbying for government restrictions on it for anti-competitive reasons.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I wonder if we are being groomed to hate it because it would be an effective tool to fight fascism with as well.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      100%

      I actually just wrote my thoughts before I saw this comment.

      I challenge anyone to go back to the articles shared here on Lemmy when AI was taken off. Compare the headlines to headlines from right wing media towards immigration. It’s uncanny how similar they are, at least to me.

      They often deal with some appeal to pathos like

      They will take our jobs They threaten our culture They will sexually assault children They will contribute to the rise in crime

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Nope. I’d still say social media/social media algorithms.

    Imagine if social media didn’t exist (beyond small, tight-knit communities like forums about [topic], or BBS communities), but all these AI tools still did.

    Susan creates an AI generated image of illegal immigrants punching toddlers, then puts it on her “news” blog full of other AI content generated to push an agenda.

    Who would see it? How would it spread? Maybe a few people she knows. It’d be pretty localised, and she’d be quickly known locally as a crank. She’d likely run out of steam and give up with the whole endeavour.

    Add social media to the mix, and all of a sudden she has tens of thousands of eyes on her, which brings more and more. People argue against it, and that entrenches the other side even more. News media sees the amount of attention it gets and they feel they have to report, and the whole thing keeps growing. Wealthy people who can benefit from the bullshit start funding it and it continues to grow still.

    You don’t need AI to do this, it just makes it even easier. You do need social media to do this. The whole model simply wouldn’t work without it.