• IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d say it’s not inherently unethical. How else would you find out about options for a thing you need?

      How current the ad industry works however, can die in a fire.

      • TheYojimbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can just search for it, you don’t need ads for that. Ads is a really bad way to find out about options, because it’s never about quality, it’s all about appearance.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          How would you know what to search for? Some advertising is fine - a sign for a restaurant or industry mailers or magazines, “related products”, etc etc are all very tame forms of advertising. The problem is hyperintrusive advertising which has now spiraled so far into hell that it drives a model of data harvesting and content slop that’s slowly tainting all access to information we have.

          • vogi@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            3 months ago

            How would you know what to search for?

            Because of the needs I have, when I am hungry ill search for recipes or restaurants. When my apartment needs cleaning ill search for cleaning supplies, when I am bored ill look up what movies are playing.

            I actually can not come up with a single situation where advertisement would be needed or helpful in anyway. I also do not have a problem with smaller advertisement, but in my dreams they are all banned regardless. Won’t be missing those.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  So how do people get on the internet or in the store? Heck, how do you know that the store exists in the first place (and if the store doesn’t have what you need, what do you do?)

                  I’m just after a middle ground - the current insanity of advertising is obviously too much, but the idea of doing away with it entirely isn’t feasible either. Burning all the advertising execs at the stake might be a good place to start in terms of reforming things…

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          The search results are ads. If I’m looking to buy a table, those don’t inherently come with a webpage. The website in its entirety is an ad.

      • LordPassionFruit@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        I walk to the store, I check what’s there, I ask an employee for help, then make my own decision. If it’s shit, I don’t get it again and tell who I know to avoid it. I don’t get products that people I trust have had bas experiences with.

        Advertisements are lying. Every dollar spent on marketing is a dollar that could have been spent either improving your product or paying your staff. If you advertise to me, I will actively avoid your product.

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          You walk to what store? How do you know the store exists? How do you know what the store sells? What if you live in a small town that doesn’t have a store that sells the required thing? How do you know where to drive to to? All this basic information about the store itself is coming from advertising. It’s not just about popups annoying you online.

        • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          So you look for items in blank white cardboard boxes that only have a technical definition of the item contained inside?

          Logos and packaging are advertising the product inside. Your friends recommending you a product is advertising that product. A company having a website is advertising. The grocery store advertising that an item is on sale is…advertising. It’s all advertising.

          What we actually hate is intrusive and malicious advertising as well as false advertising. Like billboards. Fuck billboards.

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Consent is a key factor.

        If you mail me an ad? Fuck you.

        If I search out your service and find you? Okay. Though people game this system obviously. Google used to fight back against this but now they don’t care and even have just given in, allowing pay to play. So fuck that too

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    Some local news sites in my city show local ads that are simply static images loaded in their pages, mimicking traditional newspaper ads, without any kind of tracking. Although it’s questionable at a philosophical level if ads can be ethical, I can live with it, and that method will pass automated adblockers, so it’s a win-win.

    • CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      You know, I think I’d be okay with that. As long as it’s not something that’s begging for your attention or trying to get you to click on it.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Or loading at random intervals so you have to scroll around to find where you were before the page jumped around. Very little infuriates me more.

        • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I could almost live with ads if they were static, but the typical article-reading experience without afblock goes like this:

          See the first paragraph. Start reading. An autoplay video pops in at the top of the page obscuring the view. You scroll down but it’s pinned to the top of the viewport. You close it with the miniscule x button. You finish the first paragraph and scroll down past a huge ad to the next paragraph. A banner ad appears at the bottom of the page. You dismiss it with the x. You start reading and two seconds later the banner you dismissed reappears with a new ad, obscuring the content again. You try to dismiss it, but miss and open the ad. Press back in the browser and start again from step 1.

          Its exhausting, and it’s so painfully constrained, like trying to view a webpage by peeking at it through someone’s letterbox.

          The Internet with ads, as it stands, is not worth seeing.

  • ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m old enough to remember when the internet managed to end banner ads, popup ads, and flashing ads…

    • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I remember when the white box Google Ad Words(?) first started appearing in sidebars of sites and being creeped out that they kind of knew what I was in to. Now that is everywhere.

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    This seems flipped, there’s no way a majority of people like ads.

    Maybe it should be Low IQ are people who don’t know what an ad blocker is, and High IQ are people who say ad blocking is unethical.

    • binarytobis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think you’re just used to the lemmy(/reddit) crowd. Pretty much everyone I casually know has ads when they show me something on youtube. Every time I ask “Why not use an adblocker?” they reply either “The ads don’t bother me” or “I want to support the content creators”.

      Doesn’t make sense to me. I’ll buy some swag or donate to creators I like, but I am not voluntarily watching ads.

    • DaGeek247@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I know several people who only watched the Superbowl for the advertisments / halftime show.

      Regardless of how shitty it is, one of the big cultural touchstones is also the advertisements they played on tv when someone was growing up. A lot of people use ads as another way to connect with a new person; meeting a other local to your area means you can mention a particularly overplayed ad from childhood and likely be able to find another person who saw it growing up too.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        A lot of people use ads as another way to connect with a new person; meeting a other local to your area means you can mention a particularly overplayed ad from childhood and likely be able to find another person who saw it growing up too.

        Do you think this is true for younger generations than millennials? Obviously ads with high production value like matt damon’s fortune favors the brave gets talked about, but I don’t know anyone who makes cultural references to a generic ad on TV or YouTube with average production value. I think for the average advertisement nowadays, there’s too much saturation of content and not everyone watching ads, that you couldn’t have a normal ad like this mundane Sears Air Conditioner commercial be ingrained in kids memories.

        • DaGeek247@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          You know, I expect that the generational divide will change which ads people connect over, but I don’t think that the majority of people will stop using them as a way of connection.

          The new hotness is making fun of raid shadow legends, and I expect there’s several others I just don’t know about as well.

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve been with the monk since the days of recording shows to VHS to fast forward past the commercials.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Largely bootlickers and trolls, they don’t exist in as great of numbers as the OP’s post implies. The ones on the left are far FAR more common.

  • priapus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    AdNauseum has a built in whitelist for ethical ads which I’m happy to leave enabled. I see them on some blogs I read and on the option search page for Home Manager.