Summary
Police say King Charles’s brother is in custody and officers are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk - read the police statement in full

  • thehatfox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    202
    ·
    7 days ago

    As a British person that’s something I thought I’d never see.

    Arrested on his birthday too.

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      7 days ago

      The late queen’s protection of him was a blemish on her record. I’m happy the king has cut him loose to face consequences… I wonder if they asked him before the arrest…

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        As a one of her foreign subjects. May I say god save the Queen, because nothing will save the Governor General.

        Fuck the queen, fuck the monarchy.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        And what a record it was! Empire’s torture, internment and state killings, racist borders and racist policing, catastrophic wars sold on certainty they didn’t have, colonialism and ethnic cleansing and genocides, a little bit of family racism drama as a cherry on top, and a strong propaganda machine to sell her as a sweet old woman without much power and to ensure people still defend her and worship her.

        Her record was too tarnished to blemish.

    • fiat_lux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’m not British but I’m also very surprised. I can’t help but wonder if they would have dared had he still had his title?

      on his birthday too.

      The cops took the phrase “the icing on the cake” literally, and I think it was an excellent choice.

      • gnutrino@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        7 days ago

        I can’t help but wonder if they would have dared had he still had his title?

        I would assume that the king and other interested parties will have known this was coming for a while and that is why he lost his title.

        • fiat_lux@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          Maybe, I’m not so sure. I had thought they knew it was very likely the accusations were true, but they spent a lot of time sidestepping action. If public criticism hadn’t been so relentless, they might have been content to sweep it under the rug, as is tradition.

          But I have never kept close track of the royal family, largely because I always assumed they were untouchable.

          • gnutrino@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            7 days ago

            they spent a lot of time sidestepping action

            That’s sort of my point though, they spent years protecting him and then suddenly a few months ago something made them turn on a dime and strip him of his titles very rapidly. I suspect that “something” was being told the police had enough evidence to arrest him.

            • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              7 days ago

              Someone asked Ernest Hemingway how he lost all his money.

              “Gradually, then all at once.”

              Same situation. One person says something and it’s dismissed. Ten people say it and it becomes gossip fodder. A hundred people say it and it becomes an open secret. A million people say it and he gets arrested.

            • fiat_lux@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              That’s fair. At the time I thought it might be because they were struggling to deal with both the Andrew situation and the Harry drama simultaneously, while Charles was generally more unpopular than his mother, and likely ill.

              But if they privately found out something that made the Andrew situation untenable, it makes sense that they would try to distance that ASAP. I wonder whether it’s something that has been released already or is even worse.

              Charles’ statement today on “we support the police”, plus letting them search The Lodge, definitely feels like they’re leaving him to rot. At least maybe a little.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Charles has always hated and envied Andrew. He removed him from Royal duties as soon as he had the power to do so.

            • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Charles has a complex that his parents never loved him, and merely bred him to be Sovereign. It’s why he still refuses to move in to Buckingham Palace. Andrew was unquestionably Elizabeth’s favourite child, with his frequent failures and bankruptcies excused and waved away.

              Meanwhile, Charles believes he was forced into an arranged marriage, and when that failed he was forbidden to marry the person he had always loved, with the Queen even refusing to be in the same building for a long time, despite the requirement for an heir and a spare already having been settled.

              Andrew was allowed to saddle the family with Fergie without consequence. But Fergie is an entertaining grifter, while Camilla is known as the “laziest woman in England” by her friends, so it’s not surprising she never got on with someone so duty-bound as Elizabeth.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      Blame Queen Elizabeth. She was more interested in preserving the monarchy than Andrew’s victims. There has to be a better way to promote tourism.

    • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Got to have a couple of examples of the rich and powerful going away for their crimes so the plebs don’t realise how stacked against them the system really is.