• ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I was dealing with this all last week till finally a kid did it and his battery melted the computer in my classroom. He was told multiple times not to do it so now he is getting charged with possible arson. I have dealt with him doing stupid shit for the past 3 years and now finally the admins do something because it was so outlandishly stupid they have to. I am so glad I am retiring in less than 20 days.

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Man I feel like a large part of the internet is out of reach.

    Why have I got to sign up for tiktok just to watch this happen?

    Shit like this used to be easily finable on google or something. Now I can’t seem to find shit. All I get get in news articles about it.

  • DarkWinterNights@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Nearly 20 years ago, I was in a computer programming class surrounded by clunky towers and desktops.

    Suddenly, a loud popping, then one of the machines starts belching smoke like a budget fog machine. The kid using it is calmly moved to another station while the prof investigates.

    Fifteen minutes later - pop. Smoke again.

    Turns out the kid was jamming a paperclip into the power supply like he was playing Operation: Arson Edition.

    That was his last day.

    On the bright side, computers are a lot cheaper now - and kids are still dumb. So, maybe progress?

    • muusemuuse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      This seems like something they should have engineered out of a product primarily used by schoolchildren.

    • mhague@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have the same memory, except the teacher would just pop his head out from the office and tell us to knock it off. Someone managed to draw a giant line of Axe spray across the electronics desk/counter things and made a massive fireball. Nobody really got in trouble in that class.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remain utterly convinced that Tiktok is nothing but a chinese psyop experiment to see how far they can manipulate people into actions that would otherwise be prevented by our brains screaming in self preservation.

    Has there ever been a “good” trend on tiktok? Every week its just another destructive thing that gullible idiots are being tricked into doing.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      People have just been doing dumb things for reputation since forever. We had the cinnamon challenge back in our day.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        yeah, the cinnamon challenge was dumb… but it didnt involve mass destruction, psychotic behavor, or contaminating food\ in stores.

        So its hardly comparable.

        Also it wasnt Tiktok. Predates it, significantly.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Has there ever been a “good” trend on tiktok?

      The ice bucket challenge was making rounds again. But there’s basically infinite harmless trends that nobody thinks of. The 100 men versus 1 gorilla thing is a trend and unless somebody jumps in a gorilla pen for Harambe 2.0 it’s been harmless.

      Reminder that the ice bucket challenge is something that raises awareness and funds for ALS research.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        My question was “was there ever a good trend from tiktok”

        Icebucket challenge was from before tiktok existed.

        So kinda proving my point.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree. I was exposed to a lot of leftist content on tiktok and it’s made me want to protest. Good thing you explained that it’s stupid.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        TBF TikTok wants the US Government to fail regardless of who is in office at the time.

        It’s like that meme from flippanarchy the other day.

  • frostysauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Parents and psychiatrists have been trying to wrap their heads around how some of the more dangerous Internet trends take off, especially among kids.

    Kids are dumb and they do dumb things. There’s not really that much to wrap one’s head around.

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      And it’s not even like Internet trends are a new thing. TikTok has simply offered a platform that’s extra predatory about it.

      I can imagine that TikTok has been for Internet trends, to what slot machines did for gambling.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah, like, first time?

        The presentation has changed slightly but the content is much the same. Back in the good old days I was a moderator on Totse forums (the original, but its web bulletin board incarnation and not when it was a BBS) and we literally had an entire subforum just titled “Bad Ideas.” This was where things got launched, torched, smoked, blown up, stolen, scammed, or otherwise mutilated. Or at the very least all of the above talked about, at length. All of this with an strong implicit suggestion to try it yourself. Most of the kiddos did not actually have the means to pull of what they claimed they did but the ones who could and more importantly had the means to prove it were celebrities. Usually only for a short time, for various reasons.

        The early Internet was basically just a repository for bickering about Star Trek, low grade porn, plans for how to build potato cannons, or schemes involving smoking dried banana peels. An immense amount of stupidity has always been there to be found, because the place was and is full of teenagers and teenagers are stupid.

        I sure was, when I was one.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I wish we lived in a world where they’re doing it because they don’t want locked-down toys issued by an evil corporation. But of course that’s not the reason.

    P.S. proprietary software should be illegal in education. Full stop.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I suppose the question would be the alternative.

      Note the devices actively discouraging offline save is a huge asset to schools, since kids screw up a lot, forget their devices and need loaners to get through a day and such. Extra bonus if the device can’t be too fun, to avoid them being overly used at home and get broken more.So Chromebook is desirable because they suck so much.

  • midori matcha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why throw the kids in the slammer? So they can eventually come back out as hardened criminals and contribute to the recidivism statistics, further circling society down the drain because they were betrayed by the corporations that injected their explosive products into our tax-funded school systems? They should give the TikTok kids full STEM scholarships for exposing these dangerous design flaws!

    Hold the Chromebook manufacturer liable for the unsafe hardware design flaw with no overcurrent protection, hold the school liable for recklessly issuing these dangerous laptops that cheaped out on safety features, and hold Google liable for neglecting power handling in their Chromebook software! Get the CPSC on the phone and get every single Flamebook recalled across the nation!

    It’s outrageous, egregious, preposterous!

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      But how else will google sell overpriced computers to schools despite lack of funding and force children to growing up with google products?

      • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Isn’t the entire premise of Chromebooks is that they are extremely cheap compared to having actual laptops or iPads?

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, maybe a school-issued computer should be designed differently than a consumer device.

    Maybe such things should be considered beforehand.

    In industrial ergonomics you are supposed to, ideally, present a worker with a few buttons with abundantly clear results of pressing them and no forbidden combinations leading to unexpected\undefined\dangerous results.

    Kids sticking things into what’s given to them are not an unexpected event. I’d say kids doing that are better than kids not doing that. And if it’s expected, then this is almost entrapment.

    Oh, oh, OH, you can’t just put a consumer device with a web browser with Google and MS and Apple shit into schools then? No kickbacks from those companies? So fucking sad.

    Forcing a kid to wear around a centrally managed device with a microphone and a camera makes me want to vomit. That should be illegal as many other things. It’s a disgusting world.

    These should be military-level (by resilience to attempts to throw them out of the window, sink them in the water, overheat them and so on) devices with something like FreeDOS+OpenGEM. That’s by far enough to run school programs. If you think it’s not, then you are possessed by collective delusions, that’s a thing in crowd psychology, so drink a glass of water, listen to cars\birds, look at the sky and answer which fundamentally new tasks you need to solve as compared to having year 1999 Internet (as in open a static webpage, follow links, send forms), WordPerfect and Basic. Especially at school.

    We use axes, knives, hammers and screwdrivers and other stuff to do things, more or less as they existed 300 years ago, when we are not professionals, who of course use power tools.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That can be as cheap as Chromebook. Expenses at reliability are partially redeemed by no need for such complexity and computing power.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Compared to a machine good enough to run TIE Fighter and not more - they do. Should remove that difference.

        • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          A Chromebook for school kids costs around $200 when I was in school 5 years ago… A normal computer would cost closer to 500

          • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Chromebooks are cheap compared to average laptop but still expensive compared to identical laptops with same components.

            So I should have said overcharged instead of expensive.

            2GB ram chromebooks you can find on ebay are an exception as they are not getting any more updates soon.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Arguably they already do take physical abuse into account, by focussing on cheap replacements

  • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I don’t get it. I was never this stupid as a kid.

    Edit: thank you for explaining to me that many of you were that stupid. I guess I never hung around any of you.

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      I used to be a teacher in the 2010s. I remember boys having this ghost pepper challenge they would do that would put them in literal tears.

      I never stopped them. Some just have to learn through experience that being an idiot to impress your buds isn’t going to result in a good time for you.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I defend that one, it’s just challenging yourself, no harm to anyone else or any property, almost no danger of medical harm. What’s the harm in letting them embarrass themselves for the right to claim they did something others couldn’t?

        • peregrin5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That’s why I let them do it. If it would have harmed them seriously or someone else I would have stopped it. But still doesn’t make it less stupid. They put themselves in legit pain due to peer pressure.

          If anything it served a good lesson so they might be less likely to succumb to peer pressure on things which may cause real harm in the future.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If so, I never learned that lesson. When I first heard about the one chip challenge, I was seriously tempted to challenge my teens to see if they could beat me

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        That’s, like, a normal logical one. It’s actually food, it’s spicy. It makes sense to compete to see who can handle the spicy food. This is independently invented every day.

        Stealing faucets from public bathrooms? That’s not a normal logical one. That’s a devious lick, and something invented to be highly memetic and propelled by a highly optimized algorithm that incentivizes recency, novelty, and dopamine hacking. It even effectively had a brand name!

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most of us were differently stupid, only because we didn’t have access to other people’s stupid ideas.

      My worst moment of stupidity was lighting off fireworks in a barn full of dry hay. That could have gone so much worse than just ruining some cheap disposable electronics

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ditto. I grew up helping fix VCR by replacing displaced bands and gears. I knew to be careful not the let the magic smoke come out. Bad genie!

  • ulterno@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    So you mean there are laptop USB ports out there without current limiters?
    I would want to check my PC’s ports, but I am not filthy rich, so I’ll just assume stuff is not current limited.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Google didn’t respond to Ars Technica’s request for comment.

    To be fair, I don’t really see why they should. Chances are they didn’t factor in that level of stupidity when designing those things.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It makes sense that they wouldn’t have anything to comment anyway. Google themselves don’t actually manufacture most Chromebooks, they only provide the OS. I imagine the majority of the mass of Chromebooks in the world by weight are actually designed and made by Lenovo, Asus, Dell, HP, etc. Even the Google branded ones are manufactured by someone else under contract.

      It’d be like demanding Microsoft explain to the news why your Dell caught fire simply because it had Windows installed on it.

      • FireWire400@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s another thing I was wondering about; Google used to design their own Chromebooks, but those always were the premium options and way too expensive for school use.

  • Norin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 days ago

    Youthful rebellion transcends technology.

    Is there much difference between this and, say, using a pen to drill a hole in your desk?

  • aTun@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I thought system will turn off USB port if notice current over draw. Look like I am wrong.