NarrativeBear@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months ago[image] when good infrastructure design does not just prioritize cars its a plus for everyone.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1466
arrow-up1466image[image] when good infrastructure design does not just prioritize cars its a plus for everyone.lemmy.worldNarrativeBear@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square46linkfedilink
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 months agoYou’re in the wrong community my dude
minus-squarequick_snail@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoNope. Fuck cars. All roads should be for cyclists.
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoBike lanes give guaranteed space for bikes, whereas a bike-compatible road can end up with road hogging cars giving no space for bikes, and I’m booked having to “filter through” when there’s traffic - which also increases risks for the cyclists
minus-squareevasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoAnd also not understanding of the average Rochester hills driver.
![[image] when good infrastructure design does not just prioritize cars its a plus for everyone.](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d469ed6b-d0c3-44d0-a3a8-aafcf7dc2fff.jpeg){kind=link}
You’re in the wrong community my dude
Nope. Fuck cars. All roads should be for cyclists.
Bike lanes give guaranteed space for bikes, whereas a bike-compatible road can end up with road hogging cars giving no space for bikes, and I’m booked having to “filter through” when there’s traffic - which also increases risks for the cyclists
And also not understanding of the average Rochester hills driver.