• jaykrown@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    The design is bad. The front trunk is a bad use of space, and the Japanese figured this out decades ago with the Kei truck. If you want to see real utility, look at this design.

    • jmf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Front trunks save lives in collisions though. I’d 100% rather be in a vehicle with a hood between me and another car, and I say this as an avid kei-truck fan.

      • jaykrown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        That is true, except I’m talking about utility primarily. Garbage trucks already fulfill the design I’m mentioning and are used daily in most cities already.

        • ExtraPartsLeft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Are you saying that because a heavy duty, highly specialized, utility vehicle, doesn’t have a crumple zone that the Slate truck is a bad design?

          In my view the Slate truck is designed as a work vehicle. It’s for people who need to both hual things, and have a place to store tools. It’s trunk is perfect for that.

          The Kei, and box trucks that we have in the US (which would have been a way better example for you to use.), are great for delivery vehicles. Jobs where you load things up and come back with an empty truck.

          There’s a place for both form factors. The Slate is not a bad design, it just doesn’t fit what you think the use case for a small truck is.

      • isaaclw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Hm. Interesting point.

        Maybe as we move our economy away from cars, and people dont all have to be drivers, we could also move away from cars that are poorly designed specifically around bad drivers.

        • jaykrown@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You need infrastructure to actually support an alternative, otherwise cars are a necessity for many people to get to work and the grocery store.

        • ExtraPartsLeft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah, it would be nice to not need cars. I feel like this is a step towards function and away from vanity. Which is a good thing, even if it’s not the end goal.

    • BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Americans won’t buy a Kei truck though. Granted, the frunk is a marketing concession, but it’s a fine one, if it can help push the market away from huge and expensive SUVs.

      Or, more succinctly, don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Counterpoint: One of the first things people buy for a truck is a container for the bed for things they don’t want to be in the weather but also not in the cab.

      A front-trunk eliminates this need which also frees up bed space.

      • ExtraPartsLeft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Exactly, you can usually tell someone actually needs a truck if it’s got a stainless box behind the cab. Obviously there’s still people who cosplay as truck drivers that will have them too, but there are other signs you can use to tell them apart.