“Imagine losing internet access because someone in your household downloaded pirated music.”

  • Prox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m gonna go to businesses I don’t like, hop on the Wi-Fi, and pirate from all the most obvious trackers.

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “Wanna learn about the threats to your livelihood posed by this upcoming court case? Pay us just $5 a month! Don’t worry, we’ll automatically increase that to $10 a month after three months. No action required.”

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 months ago

    Remember when a certain company just paid a large fine for pirating information to train AI?

    So step 1 should be to remove Internet access to Meta, if you aren’t going to do that, then it is 100% corrupt.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hope the SCOTUS justices aren’t using 3-strikes-you’re-out ISPs! All it would take is three random DMCA takedown notices and they’d lose Internet.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sony so mad at Cox for not cutting off someone’s Internet for downloading they’ll take it to the SCOTUS, but they won’t even use the frankly abusive laws they already have access to to just sue the end user? What is even going on?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Sony wanted mo money. Yo money wasn’t enough for them. So they got a jury to agree that Cox owes them 1 Billion dollars.

      Let’s all sing about how much we love Corporate Governance.

      Please don’t shut off my internet telecom daddy I’ll drink another Mountain Dew Verification Can!

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Because those laws aren’t doing enough to scare people into obeying. This is the next step in trying to terrorize people into submission.

    • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sony is really anti consumer. I went to buy one of their PC games the other day, but it is not available in the country I am presently in right now along with a few other developing counties when I looked into it. So if you want the title, your only option is Torrent it and such which I am sure is common here.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sony is really anti consumer.

        Throwback to when Sony intentionally packaged literal rootkits on their music CDs, so anyone who used the CD to play music had the rootkit automatically installed. And then when they were forced to make a rootkit remover, they simply installed more malware to hide any file names that matched the rootkit’s name. Which introduced an easy way for hackers to hide their own malware, by simply naming it the same as the rootkit.

        • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Right. I forgot about that. What a despicable company. It is almost like to be successful, you have to play dirty but I am not so sure it is Sony’s fault per se as if they don’t their competitors will, which will always ensure the dirty players win. It is a systemic failure of society that we have allowed unchecked Capitalism which ironically will eventually suck the oxygen out of the room to even its own detriment.

  • KelvarCherry [They/Them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    The ruling could determine whether access to the internet—today’s lifeline for education, work, and civic life—can be taken away as punishment for digital misdeeds

    And this is how we get a CCP Digital Firewall. Combine this with the Flock cameras, Ring doorbells, and years of data networks collecting information on us for advertising, and I do not see this going well at all.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    accused of repeat copyright infringements

    Does this court determine whether this concrete accusation against a person holds as well, or does this court determine whether an accusation is enough?