• Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      5 months ago

      Seriously! I get that we’re in a severe housing crisis, many people can barely afford rent and the homeless population is ever expanding, but won’t anyone think of the cars?

      Anyways, if you can’t afford an apartment, you can always sleep in your car! You can’t drive an apartment, checkmate liberals 😎

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      Underground if you really need them. In a city, a lot of people won’t need cars every day.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      We had a similar issue in Boston like 20 years ago. There was all this undeveloped land on the southern edge of downtown from closed down former port and industrial areas. Then the city wanted to redevelop it, but everyone complained about losing thousands of low cost parking spaces.

      Now we see it was a good choice with an active newly developed part of the city and a couple additional subway lines. It really is better for most people to commute by train

      The only real objection now is how could we have developed a new part of the city without building a subway there. Stupid bus is stupid

    • arsCynic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      where do you put the cars then

      Into the car-to-bike conversion machine; FuckCars™.