• palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    6 days ago

    Previous solution:

    “I don’t know.”

    “Why”

    “Because it is not possible to know everything.”

    “Why”

    And repeat until the judge declares stalemate, the baby takes up a more meaningful line of questioning, or the baby needs a nap.

  • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 days ago

    The trick is to redirect the conversation into something you’re happy to rant about for hours. “Why?” “Because mitochondria are the powerhouse of the cell, much like Horus was the powerhouse of the campaign to reunify the galaxy.” “Why?” “So in ancient Anatolia, an immortal man was born…”

  • ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 days ago

    My go to answer for my little shitlings is “why not?” to find out if they actually want to engage or just annoy me

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      For me, i tell them “why” isn’t a complete question. If you can’t make a full question like “why does we need food?” then they don’t deserve an answer because they’re just trying to be annoying.

      Or, for short, “why what?”

    • nieceandtows@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      The baby is trying to establish that the defendant went to the restaurant to gain enough energy needed to murder the victim in cold blood.

  • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Why do you think?”
    “Let’s look it up.”
    “Just because dinosaurs turned into birds doesn’t mean the chickens can turn into dinosaurs.”
    (Last one context specific)

  • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    I never truly appreciated this recurring gag in the Buttons and Mindy segments of Animaniacs until I had a toddler of my own.