• switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    18 days ago

    And not a peep out of the party of “fiscal responsibility”.

    Really says something about the Cons, doesn’t it.

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    18 days ago

    We cut all those programs and jobs and the deficit still went up?

    I wonder what happened to all that money they were saving by doing that?

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    18 days ago

    Oh no, this train is not slowing down. It can’t. In fact, it has to speed up. At least, the currency debasement has to speed up.

        • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          And then China, Western Europe, and Russia invade the United States after it initiates massive, aggressive wars to bolster its flailing economy?

          And then both sides launch nuclear weapons to end it all?

          Is this the accelerationist argument?

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          Honestly the whole Weimar turning into Nazi Germany thing was kinda a fluke historically speaking. Usually the empire in question implodes, stagnates, or decentralizes usually a mix of atleast two, unless it’s Rome where they will do all three plus a secret forth option and come out the other side.

          The Nazis frankly speaking had Alexandrian level plot armor, if anything had gone even slightly different they may have collapsed before even operation Barbarossa.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    17 days ago

    Then if Dems get in power suddenly Republicans will care about spending again. Everyone knows how this song and dance goes.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    17 days ago

    Wow, interest alone on the debt is now hitting $1trillion a year and expected to hit $14 trillion in 10 years!?

    And this is despite Americans being taxed $350bn through trumps tarrifs.

    Elon Musk is very quiet about this - wasn’t this why he went all in on DOGE?

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      17 days ago

      He went for Doge to remove or incapacitate agencies inconveniencing his businesses, particularly SpaceX. The Doge Dumbasses wrecked everything else by vibe.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 days ago

    Trumpflation returns. Its the biggest, most beautiful type of inflation where rich people get richer and everyone else pays more.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    17 days ago

    Why did no one warn us that a failure of a businessman would utterly fail at the business of running an economy?

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 days ago

    Unstoppable debt spiral. Basically this, the more people come to realize it’s never being paid back, the faster it will grow, and the faster it grows, the more people realize it’s never being paid back. It doesn’t really mean anything at this point.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 days ago

      Even if that were true, you can’t escape the consequences

      https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/061515/what-are-some-historic-examples-hyperinflation.asp#%3A~%3Atext=Hyperinflation+is+a+rapid+and%2Cits+currency+value+became+worthless.

      Is the U.S. at Risk of Hyperinflation?

      There would need to be a significant and highly unlikely drop in production and a massive increase in circulating currency for hyperinflation to occur in the U.S.

      You my think that paragraph on the us is encouraging, but consider today’s reality

      • disruption caused by general tariffs government investments, and the government reneging on commitments is quite likely to cause a sudden drop in production. There is a lot of recession talk
      • the current administration is trying to force the federal reserve to effectively print money, create a massive increase in circulating currency by cutting interest rates, total Y the opposite of what you need to do to control inflation
        • Laser@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 days ago

          Surely there’d be no other downsides

          But yeah inflation outpacing interest is mostly good for the borrower.

      • jaykrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        We can’t completely escape the consequences, but they can be mitigated. I don’t have a lot to lose. I don’t benefit from a 401k or social security. There’s a reason why investors are flocking to gold.

        Something that needs to change is how real estate is seen as an investment. It has broken the quality of life increase in the US by gatekeeping real estate, drastically increasing cost of living, while building nothing new to preserve investment. When you make housing an investment, it becomes in your best interest to stop building more to reduce supply and preserve value.