• frustrated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    No money in curing cancer with an LLM. Heaps of money taking advantage if increasingly alienated and repressed people.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There’s loads of money in curing cancer. For one you can sell the cure for cancer to people with cancer.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      You could sell the cure for a fortune. Imagine something that can reliably cure late stage cancers. You could charge a million for the treatment, easily.

      • frustrated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, selling the actual cure would be profitable…but an LLM would only ever provide the text for synthesizing it but none of the extensive testing, licensing, or manufacturing, etc… An existing pharmaceutical company would have to believe the LLM and then front the costs for the development, testing, and manufacture…which constitutes a large proportion of the costs of bringing a treatment to market. Burning compute time on that is a waste of resources, especially when fleecing horny losers is available right now. It is just business.

        • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          and LLMs hallucinate a lot of shit they “know” nothing about. a big pharma company spending millions of dollars on an LLM hallucination would crack me the fuck up were it not such a serious disease.

          • frustrated@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Right, that is why I originally said there is no money in a cancer cure invented by LLM. It’s just not a serious possibility.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      What a weird take, research use AI already? Some researchers even research things that, gasp, is not monetiseable right away!

      • frustrated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I used to work in academic physics, and I currently work in data science. I am deeply familiar with both ends of the subject in question. LLMs are useful research tools because they speed up the reference finding and literature review process, not because they synthesize new information that does not need to be independently verified.

        In the context of medical research, they could absolutely use LLMs to facilitate a literature search. What LLMs cannot do is hand researchers a proposed cure that they could sell to people. You still need to do the leg work of synthesizing the molecules, standardizing the process, industrializing it, patenting it, multiple rounds of testing on increasingly complex animals and eventually people, and then going through the drug approval process with the FDA and others. LLMs speed up the CHEAPEST and EASIEST part of the research process. That is why LLMs will not be handing us the cure for cancer.