• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m an adult, there’s no reason I can’t have the bot talk dirty to me. That’s a lot of text for essentially saying you wish the censorship stayed.

    Surveillance state and data extraction are real issues that need to be tackled at the root (which isn’t AI).

    • Alloi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      i feel like you really need to take the time to research the implications of AI and surveillance more. specifically how the US and virtually every government and tech corporation on the planet is intending/already using them, together.

      AI exists because of illegal/unconsentual data extraction, its almost entirely built on it, and theres no way that will likely ever stop. you can attempt to regulate it, but the US governement deregulated it on purpose for a bribe and the promise of more control.

      it wont happen while money and power still exist at the end of the rainbow.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is precisely why I’m saying AI and our surveillance state are completely different issues.

        Yes the surveillance state is really bad and we need comprehensive laws that protect our personal data.

        That being said, what the copyright industry is desperately clinging to has nothing to do with that. Your second paragraph has nothing to do with the first. So I don’t agree with both, I only agree with the first, which is my main point, about how they are seperate issues.

        • Alloi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          my main point is that there is no possible way to seperate the two. you can dream about it if you like, work on it on a limited local version, but even that has its risks. but if you ever want to use the big models, there will be no separation between AI and the state. you are being surveilled. and there is zero shot they will ever relinquish that power once they have it. even “altruistic” governments wouldnt do that, for them its a matter of national security at this point.

          i am serious when i say this, you shouldnt listen to me and you should fight tooth and nail to stop this if you think its possible, i am doing my part by warning as many people as i can, and spreading the word whenever possible. both AI and surveillance states, even when completely separated, are going to be a massive detriment to the average persons freedom in the long run. added together, we are pretty much screwed already. its already being implemented.

          cats out the bag, pandoras box, all that.