• decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    We are assuming that somehow if Wayn pays large sums of wealth to the government, the government wouldn’t just be their usual wasteful, corrupt, self serving self with said money. You get every current billionaire in the USA to pay a fair tax. Where do you think the money goes? Funding for food stamps or Lockeed-Martin?

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      Also in the DC universe, the equivalent of Lockeed-Martin is Wayne Enterprises. There’s stories where Bruce is conflicted in making weapons, but nonetheless, his fortune is built on the military industrial complex.

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        So Bruce Wayne is somehow worse than freaking Tony Stark?

        Then again Stark is an inventor and comics-level genius who lacks a secret identity, so pivoting to another industry was way easier for him. Bruce Wayne probably can’t change his company too much without losing a ton of pull and drawing unwanted attention to himself, plus losing access to the gadgets he relies on.

        • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Didn’t Stark divest from weapons manufacturing to researching clean energy instead, after he got hit by that one bomb of his?

          I haven’t read the comics, just what I remember from the movies

          • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Yeah, that’s why I said worse than Stark. He pivoted away from supporting the Military-Industrial Complex when he realized it was hurting people, whereas Batman hasn’t.

            It’s just odd since Batman is supposed to have ironclad ethics, whereas Iron Man is famously a hypocritical ass (though much less so in the MCU than in the comics, from what I’ve heard).

            • phx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              Meanwhile, the DoD is like: “Hey, anyone else kinda wondering why these bombs, ammunition boxes, and rifles are all kinds bat-shaped. Wayne enterprises is weird”

    • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      If the income tax graduations are steep enough then the billionaire class will optimize to minimize taxes by reducing their own income in favor of reinvesting in their business and employees. In theory. In reality I’m sure they’d find some way to squirrel it away while their employees apply for and get denied food stamps.

    • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’re assuming we’d stop at Bruce Wayne.

      The same people willing go after Batman are willing to go after Lockheed-Martin and every politician they paid for.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think pretty much every study even made has shown taxing the rich and investing in the public reduce crime rates and poverty. It’s the reason the USA had a massive middle class before Reagan and has experienced massive wealth disparity today: differences in tax policy and public investment.