Neither capitalism nor authoritarianism are necessary to breed innovation. Lots of non-authoritarian places have great science, too.
Also, great science does not suggest a country is a good place to live. There’s lots of great science being done in the US, too, despite its horribleness.
How do they get the glue into the fracture, though. Wouldn’t that require surgery?
I thought I knew which study this was talking about, and I was going to say “Yes, it’s to help with situations where surgical intervention is needed to put the bone back together” but I went and found the article I read and that one was a team of American and Korean scientists, so I actually don’t know about the Chinese one. I assume it’s the same idea, that it’s for use in surgical situations.
The one I thought it was talking about was this one, which is a cool idea but still has some kinks to work out.
I can’t read the specific study they’re citing here, but from reporting on it this sounds like it’s being just a little bit overhyped - a quick setting glue is critically important, but the situations in which you’d use a metal plate for osteoimmobilization are with extreme displaced fractures and something that could even be accessed with a 3 minute surgery (and evidently yes, this glue does require surgery) would not merit a metal plate in any case.
The actual development sounds like it’s a very fast setting bone-bonding bio-absorbing surgical glue that doesn’t require extensive cleaning of the bonding site. That does sound like an extremely useful development, but it’s also not a novel product by any means. This seems like another entry in the trend of pro-china hyped science reporting that absolutely removes all the interesting details in their quest to push a narrative (which uh… no hang on, that’s all modern science reporting)
I’m back in the us for the first time in 6 years.
I was just asked to leave by a machine after buying a $4 bottle of water in the airport.
What the hell?
The vending machine asked you to leave it was there a separate machine just to ask for the leaving?
Why not both?
I could be wrong, but China now surpassed US in terms of R&D spending. That explains a lot.
And it’s being done without regard for maximizing profit
I don’t like the authoritarianism, but I kinda like China’s approach to reorient the economy depending on the needs. Too much economic growth at the expense of public investment, and they will reorient towards more public services and vice versa. This sounds similar to Keynesian economics and I am an old school proponent of Keynesianism.
China is full of engineers, US is full of lawyers.
And MBAs to give the lawyers work while the “consumer” population foots the bill
Tbf, America is busy arguing about the Superbowl halftime show… and how big the wh ballroom will be… and whether the UN escalator tried to assassinate the president…
When you can’t read that you are in a communist space
